Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan;80(1):59-73.
doi: 10.1111/anae.16462. Epub 2024 Nov 3.

Patient safety incidents in anaesthesia: a qualitative study of trainee experience from a single UK healthcare region

Affiliations

Patient safety incidents in anaesthesia: a qualitative study of trainee experience from a single UK healthcare region

Amelia Robinson et al. Anaesthesia. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Anaesthetic training has always had patient safety as part of the curriculum. However, there is limited emphasis on what happens when things do not go to plan. Our aims were to understand the impact of involvement in patient safety incidents on anaesthetic trainees in our region, to describe the range of support currently offered and put forward suggestions for improvement.

Methods: An initial electronic survey was sent to all anaesthetic trainees in a single UK healthcare region to capture qualitative and quantitative information on patient safety incidents. After completing the questionnaire, participants were asked to consent to involvement in a semi-structured interview to provide a more detailed understanding of the impact of safety incidents. Data were analysed from the questionnaires and interview transcripts using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.

Results: Thirty-four completed questionnaires were analysed revealing 27 trainees had been involved in a patient safety incident. Ten semi-structured interviews were conducted and six themes were identified: team dynamics (including adequacy of staffing and supportive departmental culture); context of the event; reflex immediate support post-event; working environment pending completion of the investigation; personal impact (including physical and mental health); and suggestions for future support.

Conclusion: This study has shown the significant impact of safety incidents on anaesthetic trainees in one training region in the UK and highlights the importance of implementing early, tailored debriefs led by trained facilitators, the value of a supportive work environment and the need to raise awareness of system-based approaches to learning from incident investigations. Further research should guide the format and delivery of support for trainees to provide more helpful and timely interventions after patient safety incidents and reduce the risk of future harm to both patients and trainees.

Keywords: debriefing; patient safety incidents; qualitative methodology; training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Recommendations for support of anaesthetic trainees in the aftermath of a safety incident. TRiM, Trauma Risk Management; M & M, morbidity and mortality meeting.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. General Medical Council . Guidance on supporting information for revalidation. 2024. https://www.gmc‐uk.org/registration‐and‐licensing/managing‐your‐registra... (accessed 10/06/2024).
    1. NHS England . Patient Safety Incident Response Framework. 2022. https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/patient‐safety‐incident‐response‐... (accessed 10/06/2024).
    1. NHS Resolution . Being fair – supporting a just and learning culture for staff and patients following incidents in the NHS. 2019. https://resolution.nhs.uk/wp‐content/uploads/2019/07/NHS‐Resolution‐Bein... (accessed 10/06/2024).
    1. Gazoni FM, Durieux ME, Wells L. Life after death: the aftermath of perioperative catastrophes. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 591–600. 10.1213/ane.0b013e31817a9c77. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wu AW. Medical error: the second victim. The doctor who makes the mistake needs help too. BMJ 2000; 320: 726–727. 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.726. - DOI - PMC - PubMed