Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Oct 24;12(10):23259671241265840.
doi: 10.1177/23259671241265840. eCollection 2024 Oct.

Association of Anterior Knee Pain With Extension Deficit After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Association of Anterior Knee Pain With Extension Deficit After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Jim D Georgoulis et al. Orthop J Sports Med. .

Abstract

Background: Previous systematic reviews have reported the incidence of anterior knee pain (AKP) and extension deficit (ED) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR); however, both outcomes are estimated separately and thus are assumed to be uncorrelated.

Purpose: To estimate whether there is a clinically relevant association between the population effects of ED and AKP after ACLR.

Study design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods: Under PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library electronic databases for published articles reporting incidence of both AKP and ED after ACLR with either bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) or hamstring (HS) graft that returned 298 studies after the initial search. A Bayesian hierarchical measurement error model estimated the population effect of ED and AKP.

Results: Twelve publications involving 976 patients (mean follow-up, 77.9 months; range, 24-180 months) were included in the systematic review. There was a clear, moderate correlation between population ED and population AKP for the BPTB (r = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.39-0.42) and the HS grafts (r = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.33-0.36). Model expected estimates for the population effects of AKP and ED were 24.1% (95% CI, 17.4%-31.9%) and 17.5% (95% CI, 10.6%-25.0%), respectively, for the BPTB graft and 16.1% (95% CI, 9.2%-23.9%) and 13.1% ED (95% CI, 6.0%-20.8%) for the HS graft, respectively. The posterior mean difference in AKP between BPTB and HS grafts was clear and substantial (8.3% [95% CI, 0.3% to 16.1%]); there was no substantial difference in the posterior mean difference of ED between BPTB and HS grafts (4.3% [95% CI, -3.8% to 13.0%).

Conclusion: Our systematic review demonstrated a moderate but clear correlation between ED and AKP irrespective of graft type. From a clinical perspective, this association emphasizes the need for intraoperative achievement of full extension and avoidance of situations that may cause ED. The higher incidence of AKP in patients with BPTB graft may also be attributed to factors related to the graft harvest site. Future metaregression analyses could investigate whether additional factors such as follow-up duration or rehabilitation protocols can moderate the association between AKP and ED after ACLR with either BPTB or HS graft.

Keywords: ACL; Bayesian modeling; autograft; knee; patellar tendon.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this contribution. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flowchart. BPTB, bone–patellar tendon–bone; HS, hamstring.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Model expected population effects of anterior knee pain and extension deficit by graft type.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Differences in the posterior distributions of model expected population effects of (A) anterior knee pain and (B) extension deficit between graft types. The vertical solid black lines denote 95% CI of the distribution of differences and the dashed red line denotes zero.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Posterior distribution of the population effects of anterior knee pain (AKP) and extension deficit (ED) for (A) bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB) and (B) hamstring (HS).

Similar articles

References

    1. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Zaccherotti G, De Biase P. Patellar tendon versus doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22(2):211-217. - PubMed
    1. Belk JW, Kraeutler MJ, Carver TJ, McCarty EC. Knee osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone–patellar tendon–bone versus hamstring tendon autograft: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(4):1358-1365. - PubMed
    1. Bowman EN, Limpisvasti O, Cole BJ, El Attrache N. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft preference most dependent on patient age: a survey of United States surgeons. Arthroscopy. 2021;37(5):1559-1566. - PubMed
    1. Brinlee AW, Dickenson SB, Hunter-Giordano A, Snyder-Mackler L. ACL reconstruction rehabilitation: clinical data, biologic healing, and criterion-based milestones to inform a return-to-sport guideline. Sports Health. 2022;14(5):770-779. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burkner PC. Brms: an R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. J Stat Soft. 2017;80:1-28.

LinkOut - more resources