Association of Anterior Knee Pain With Extension Deficit After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 39492875
- PMCID: PMC11529350
- DOI: 10.1177/23259671241265840
Association of Anterior Knee Pain With Extension Deficit After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Background: Previous systematic reviews have reported the incidence of anterior knee pain (AKP) and extension deficit (ED) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR); however, both outcomes are estimated separately and thus are assumed to be uncorrelated.
Purpose: To estimate whether there is a clinically relevant association between the population effects of ED and AKP after ACLR.
Study design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 2.
Methods: Under PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library electronic databases for published articles reporting incidence of both AKP and ED after ACLR with either bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) or hamstring (HS) graft that returned 298 studies after the initial search. A Bayesian hierarchical measurement error model estimated the population effect of ED and AKP.
Results: Twelve publications involving 976 patients (mean follow-up, 77.9 months; range, 24-180 months) were included in the systematic review. There was a clear, moderate correlation between population ED and population AKP for the BPTB (r = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.39-0.42) and the HS grafts (r = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.33-0.36). Model expected estimates for the population effects of AKP and ED were 24.1% (95% CI, 17.4%-31.9%) and 17.5% (95% CI, 10.6%-25.0%), respectively, for the BPTB graft and 16.1% (95% CI, 9.2%-23.9%) and 13.1% ED (95% CI, 6.0%-20.8%) for the HS graft, respectively. The posterior mean difference in AKP between BPTB and HS grafts was clear and substantial (8.3% [95% CI, 0.3% to 16.1%]); there was no substantial difference in the posterior mean difference of ED between BPTB and HS grafts (4.3% [95% CI, -3.8% to 13.0%).
Conclusion: Our systematic review demonstrated a moderate but clear correlation between ED and AKP irrespective of graft type. From a clinical perspective, this association emphasizes the need for intraoperative achievement of full extension and avoidance of situations that may cause ED. The higher incidence of AKP in patients with BPTB graft may also be attributed to factors related to the graft harvest site. Future metaregression analyses could investigate whether additional factors such as follow-up duration or rehabilitation protocols can moderate the association between AKP and ED after ACLR with either BPTB or HS graft.
Keywords: ACL; Bayesian modeling; autograft; knee; patellar tendon.
© The Author(s) 2024.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this contribution. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.
Figures




Similar articles
-
A meta-analysis of bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus four-strand hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Knee. 2015 Mar;22(2):100-10. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.11.014. Epub 2014 Dec 11. Knee. 2015. PMID: 25547048 Review.
-
Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft Combined With Modified Lemaire Technique Versus Hamstring Graft Combined With Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Clinical Comparative Matched Study With a Mean Follow-up of 5 Years From The SANTI Study Group.Am J Sports Med. 2022 Feb;50(2):395-403. doi: 10.1177/03635465211061123. Epub 2021 Dec 13. Am J Sports Med. 2022. PMID: 34898285
-
Outcome of bone-patellar tendon-bone vs hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with a 5-year minimum follow-up.Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Nov 25;99(48):e23476. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023476. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020. PMID: 33235137 Free PMC article.
-
Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Am J Sports Med. 2022 Oct;50(12):3425-3439. doi: 10.1177/03635465211030259. Epub 2021 Sep 8. Am J Sports Med. 2022. PMID: 34494906
-
Incidence of Osteoarthritis Between ACL Reconstruction With Different Graft Types and Between ACL Reconstruction and Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Aug 14;12(8):23259671241258775. doi: 10.1177/23259671241258775. eCollection 2024 Aug. Orthop J Sports Med. 2024. PMID: 39157020 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Zaccherotti G, De Biase P. Patellar tendon versus doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1994;22(2):211-217. - PubMed
-
- Belk JW, Kraeutler MJ, Carver TJ, McCarty EC. Knee osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone–patellar tendon–bone versus hamstring tendon autograft: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(4):1358-1365. - PubMed
-
- Bowman EN, Limpisvasti O, Cole BJ, El Attrache N. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft preference most dependent on patient age: a survey of United States surgeons. Arthroscopy. 2021;37(5):1559-1566. - PubMed
-
- Burkner PC. Brms: an R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. J Stat Soft. 2017;80:1-28.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources