Impact of 3D-Printed Anatomical Models on Doctor-Patient Communication in Orthopedic Consultations: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- PMID: 39493008
- PMCID: PMC11531919
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.70822
Impact of 3D-Printed Anatomical Models on Doctor-Patient Communication in Orthopedic Consultations: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Effective communication between doctors and patients is essential for treatment adherence and better clinical outcomes. Although 3D printing has advanced in medicine, its impact on doctor-patient communication still requires further investigation. This randomized clinical trial evaluated the effectiveness of 3D anatomical models as a tool to facilitate communication in orthopedic consultations. This randomized clinical trial was conducted between May 2024 and September 2024, with 46 patients randomized into two groups: 21 patients received medical explanations with the aid of 3D models, and 25 without. Patients' knowledge was assessed before and after the consultation, and the quality of communication was measured using the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT). In the group using 3D models, 76.19% of patients reported improved knowledge of their conditions, while in the group without models, the increase was 52.00%. Additionally, 14 out of 15 CAT parameters showed statistically significant differences between the groups, with p-values ranging from 0.001 to 0.021. The use of 3D models significantly improved patients' understanding and facilitated communication with doctors, proving to be an effective tool for explaining complex medical conditions.
Keywords: anatomical models; health communication; orthopedics; patient education as topic; physician-patient relations; three-dimensional (3d) printing.
Copyright © 2024, Sanchez et al.
Conflict of interest statement
Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Federal University of Pernambuco issued approval 74428223.2.0000.5208. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Health Sciences Center at the Federal University of Pernambuco (CAAE: 74428223.2.0000.5208), and all participants provided written informed consent. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Similar articles
-
The Effect of Screen-to-Screen Versus Face-to-Face Consultation on Doctor-Patient Communication: An Experimental Study with Simulated Patients.J Med Internet Res. 2017 Dec 20;19(12):e421. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8033. J Med Internet Res. 2017. PMID: 29263017 Free PMC article.
-
3D-printed patient-specific applications in orthopedics.Orthop Res Rev. 2016 Oct 14;8:57-66. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S99614. eCollection 2016. Orthop Res Rev. 2016. PMID: 30774470 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Piloting the Use of Patient-Specific Cardiac Models as a Novel Tool to Facilitate Communication During Cinical Consultations.Pediatr Cardiol. 2017 Apr;38(4):813-818. doi: 10.1007/s00246-017-1586-9. Epub 2017 Feb 18. Pediatr Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28214968 Free PMC article.
-
The efficacy of using 3D printing models in the treatment of fractures: a randomised clinical trial.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Feb 8;20(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2448-9. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019. PMID: 30736770 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Active Materials for 3D Printing in Small Animals: Current Modalities and Future Directions for Orthopedic Applications.Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jan 18;23(3):1045. doi: 10.3390/ijms23031045. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. PMID: 35162968 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Three-Dimensional-Printed Models and Shared Decision-Making: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2513187. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.13187. JAMA Netw Open. 2025. PMID: 40459895 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Doctor-patient communication: a review and a rationale for using an assessment framework. Belasen A, Belasen AT. J Health Organ Manag. 2018;32:891–907. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous