A Mark-Recapture Approach to Estimating Item Pool Compromise
- PMID: 39494042
- PMCID: PMC11528777
- DOI: 10.1177/01466216241284410
A Mark-Recapture Approach to Estimating Item Pool Compromise
Abstract
Testing organizations routinely investigate if secure exam material has been compromised and is consequently invalid for scoring and inclusion on future assessments. Beyond identifying individual compromised items, knowing the degree to which a form is compromised can inform decisions on whether the form can no longer be administered or when an item pool is compromised to such an extent that serious action on a broad scale must be taken to ensure the validity of score interpretations. Previous research on estimating the population of item compromise is sparse; however, this is a more generally long-studied problem in ecological research. In this note, we exemplify the utility of the mark-recapture technique to estimate the population of compromised items, first through a brief demonstration to introduce the fundamental concepts and then a more realistic scenario to illustrate applicability to large-scale testing programs. An effective use of this technique would be to longitudinally track changes in the estimated population to inform operational test security strategies. Many variations on mark-recapture exist and interpretation of the estimated population depends on several factors. Thus, this note is only meant to introduce the concept of mark-recapture as a useful application to evaluate a testing organization's compromise mitigation procedures.
Keywords: test security, item compromise, mark-recapture.
© The Author(s) 2024.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Similar articles
-
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025. PMID: 39915110
-
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500. Health Technol Assess. 2012. PMID: 23302507 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x. Respir Res. 2024. PMID: 39709425 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35593186 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024. PMID: 39051924
References
-
- Carlson S. R., Coggins L. G., Swanton C. O. (1998). A simple stratified design for mark- recapture estimation of salmon smolt abundance. Alaska Fishery Research Bulletin, 5(1), 88–102.
-
- Chapman D. G. (1951). Some properties of the hypergeometric distribution with applications to zoological censuses. University of California Publications in Statistic, 1(7), 131–160.
-
- Fletcher D., Dawson S., Slooten E. (2002). Designing a mark-recapture study to allow for local emigration. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 7(4), 586–593. 10.1198/108571102799 - DOI
-
- Han N., Hambleton R. (2008). Detecting exposed test items in computer-based testing. In Ramaswamy R., Wild C. (Eds.), Improving testing: Process tools and techniques to assure quality (pp. 323–348). Routledge.
-
- Hanson B. A., Harris D. J., Brennan R. L. (1994). A comparison of several statistical methods for examining allegations of copying (ACT Research Report Series No. 87-15). American College Testing.