Comparative efficacy of interpersonal psychotherapy and antidepressant medication for adult depression: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis
- PMID: 39494789
- PMCID: PMC11578913
- DOI: 10.1017/S0033291724001788
Comparative efficacy of interpersonal psychotherapy and antidepressant medication for adult depression: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis
Abstract
Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) and antidepressant medications are both first-line interventions for adult depression, but their relative efficacy in the long term and on outcome measures other than depressive symptomatology is unknown. Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses can provide more precise effect estimates than conventional meta-analyses. This IPD meta-analysis compared the efficacy of IPT and antidepressants on various outcomes at post-treatment and follow-up (PROSPERO: CRD42020219891). A systematic literature search conducted May 1st, 2023 identified randomized trials comparing IPT and antidepressants in acute-phase treatment of adults with depression. Anonymized IPD were requested and analyzed using mixed-effects models. The prespecified primary outcome was post-treatment depression symptom severity. Secondary outcomes were all post-treatment and follow-up measures assessed in at least two studies. IPD were obtained from 9 of 15 studies identified (N = 1536/1948, 78.9%). No significant comparative treatment effects were found on post-treatment measures of depression (d = 0.088, p = 0.103, N = 1530) and social functioning (d = 0.026, p = 0.624, N = 1213). In smaller samples, antidepressants performed slightly better than IPT on post-treatment measures of general psychopathology (d = 0.276, p = 0.023, N = 307) and dysfunctional attitudes (d = 0.249, p = 0.029, N = 231), but not on any other secondary outcomes, nor at follow-up. This IPD meta-analysis is the first to examine the acute and longer-term efficacy of IPT v. antidepressants on a broad range of outcomes. Depression treatment trials should routinely include multiple outcome measures and follow-up assessments.
Keywords: Depression; antidepressant medication; efficacy; individual participant data meta-analysis; interpersonal psychotherapy.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Cohen previously held stock options in AbleTo, which he received as compensation for advice on the clinical content of Joyable's digital cognitive therapy for depression. Dr. Markowitz reports salary support from New York State Psychiatric Institute, research grant support from the Columbia Velocity Fund, National Institute of Mental Health, and Department of Defense, and minor book royalties, some related to interpersonal psychotherapy. Dr. Weissman receives royalties from books on IPT from Oxford Press, Perseus Press and APA publishing, but she also provides one open access book published in 2024 (free of charge) which describes the methods and current use of IPT. Dr. Blom reports personal fees from ‘Leerboek Interpersoonlijke psychotherapie’ outside the submitted work. Dr. Driessen reports a grant from the Netherlands Organisation of Scientific Research (NWO) during the conduct of the study. Drs. Weitz, Hollon, Browne, Rucci, Corda, Menchetti, Bagby, Quilty, Altamura, Zobel, Schramm, Gois, Twisk and Cuijpers, Ms. Breunese, and Mr. Wienicke have nothing to disclose.
Figures
References
-
- Altamura, M., Iuso, S., Terrone, G., Balzotti, A., Carnevale, R., Malerba, S., … Petito, A. (2017). Comparing interpersonal counseling and antidepressant treatment in primary care patients with anxious and nonanxious major depression disorder: A randomized control trial. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 14(4), 257–262.
-
- American Psychological Association. (2019). Clinical practice guideline for the treatment of depression across three age cohorts. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/depression-guideline
-
- Browne, G., Steiner, M., Roberts, J., Gafni, A., Byrne, C., Dunn, E., … Wallik, D. (2002). Sertraline and/or interpersonal psychotherapy for patients with dysthymic disorder in primary care: 6-month comparison with longitudinal 2-year follow-up of effectiveness and costs. Journal of Affective Disorders, 68(2–3), 317–330. 10.1016/S0165-0327(01)00343-3 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
