Enhanced Recovery After Craniotomy: Global Practices, Challenges, and Perspectives
- PMID: 39494915
- DOI: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000001011
Enhanced Recovery After Craniotomy: Global Practices, Challenges, and Perspectives
Abstract
The global demand for hospital care, driven by population growth and medical advances, emphasizes the importance of optimized resource management. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols aim to expedite patient recovery and reduce health care costs without compromising patient safety or satisfaction. Its principles have been adopted in various surgical specialties but have not fully encompassed all areas of neurosurgery, including craniotomy. ERAS for craniotomy has been shown to reduce the length of hospital stay and costs without increasing complications. ERAS protocols may also reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting and perioperative opioid requirements, highlighting their potential to enhance patient outcomes and health care efficiency. Despite these benefits, guidelines, and strategies for ERAS in craniotomy remain limited. This narrative review explores the current global landscape of ERAS for craniotomy, assessing existing literature and highlighting knowledge gaps. Experts from 26 countries with diverse cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds contributed to this review, offering insights about current ERAS protocol applications, implementation challenges, and future perspectives, and providing a comprehensive global overview of ERAS for craniotomy. Representatives from all 6 World Health Organization geographical world areas reported that barriers to the implementation of ERAS for craniotomy include the absence of standardized protocols, provider resistance to change, resource constraints, insufficient education, and research scarcity. This review emphasizes the necessity of tailored ERAS protocols for low and middle-income countries, addressing differences in available resources. Acknowledging limitations in subjectivity and article selection, this review provides a comprehensive overview of ERAS for craniotomy from a global perspective and underscores the need for adaptable ERAS protocols tailored to specific health care systems and countries.
Keywords: ERAS for craniotomy; ERAS global perspective; enhanced recovery in craniotomy; hospital cost reduction; hospital length of stay.
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
References
-
- Health at a Glance 2023: OECD Indicators, Hospital beds and occupancy. Accessed April 12, 2024. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/bdd23022-en/index.html?itemId=/conte...
-
- Colombo F, Guanais F, Haywood P, et al. Ready for the Next Crisis? Investing in Health System Resilience, OECD Health Policy Studies. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2023. doi:10.1787/1e53cf80-en. Accessed April 10, 2024. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/1e53cf80-en/index.html?itemId=/conten...
-
- Alkire BC, Raykar NP, Shrime MG, et al. Global access to surgical care: a modelling study. Lancet Glob Heal. 2015;3:e316–e323. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)70115-4
-
- Loughlin SM, Alvarez A, Falcão LFDR, et al. The history of ERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery) society and its development in Latin America. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2020;47. doi:10.1590/0100-6991e-20202525 - DOI
-
- Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78:606–617. doi:10.1093/bja/78.5.606 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources