Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2442979.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.42979.

Food Insecurity Among LGBQ+ Veterans

Affiliations

Food Insecurity Among LGBQ+ Veterans

Sylvia V Haigh et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Food insecurity is associated with numerous adverse health outcomes. Little is known about the prevalence of and risks for food insecurity among veterans identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, and similar (LGBQ+), a population facing unique social barriers and medical comorbidities.

Objective: To examine food insecurity and potential risk factors among LGBQ+ veterans.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective, cross-sectional study used administrative data from all US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities nationally. Participants included veterans screened for food insecurity between March 1, 2021, and August 31, 2023.

Exposure: Positive response to food insecurity screening administered in VHA facilities as part of routine clinical care.

Main outcomes and measures: Prevalence of and sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors associated with food insecurity among veterans identifying as LGBQ+ or heterosexual and those with "don't know" responses regarding their sexual orientation.

Results: Of 3 580 148 veterans screened, the mean (SD) age was 61.6 (0.4) years; 3 192 507 (89.2%) were assigned male sex at birth. A total of 83 292 veterans (2.3%) identified as LGBQ+, and 10 183 (0.3%) had "don't know" responses. LGBQ+ veterans (5352 [6.4%]) and veterans with "don't know" responses (635 [6.2%]) were more than twice as likely as heterosexual veterans (90 426 [2.6%]) to have positive screen results for food insecurity. While risk factors for food insecurity were similar for veterans across sexual orientation groups, LGBQ+ veterans had higher rates of several risk factors compared with heterosexual veterans, including age younger than 45 years (45.3% vs 19.5%), female sex assigned at birth (44.1% vs 10.0%), being in a minoritized racial or ethnic group (34.7% vs 29.8%), unmarried or unpartnered status (69.1% vs 39.7%), low income (16.4% vs 14.9%), homelessness or housing instability (10.3% vs 5.4%), anxiety (7.7% vs 4.3%), depression (31.1% vs 19.3%), suicidality (3.6% vs 1.4%), posttraumatic stress disorder (42.2% vs 30.2%), substance use disorder (13.1% vs 9.0%), military sexual trauma (24.0% vs 5.4%), and recent intimate partner violence (2.6% vs 1.4%).

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of veterans screened for food insecurity, LGBQ+ veterans and those with "don't know" responses for sexual orientation experienced food insecurity at nearly 2.5 times the rate of heterosexual veterans. While risk factors for food insecurity were similar across groups, LGBQ+ veterans faced a higher prevalence of particular risks, including homelessness and several mental health and trauma-related comorbidities. Future work should examine targeted screening and interventions tailored to identifying and addressing food insecurity in this population, given their increased vulnerability and burden of food insecurity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Flowchart of the Analytic Sample

Similar articles

References

    1. Rabbitt MP, Reed-Jones M, Hales L.J, Burke MP. Household food security in the United States in 2023. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, report No. ERR-337). 2024. Accessed October 16, 2024. https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=109895
    1. Gundersen C, Ziliak JP. Food insecurity and health outcomes. Health Aff (Millwood). 2015;34(11):1830-1839. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0645 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Te Vazquez J, Feng SN, Orr CJ, Berkowitz SA. Food insecurity and cardiometabolic conditions: a review of recent research. Curr Nutr Rep. 2021;10(4):243-254. doi:10.1007/s13668-021-00364-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mabli J, Ohls J, Dragoset LM, Canstner L, Santos B. Measuring the effect of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participation on food security. August 2013. Accessed July 31, 2024. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-A98-PURL-gpo62712/pdf/GOVPUB-...
    1. Restrepo BJ, Rabbitt MP, Gregory CA. The effect of unemployment on food spending and adequacy: evidence from coronavirus-induced firm closures. Appl Econ Perspect Policy. 2021;43(1):185-204. doi:10.1002/aepp.13143 - DOI

Publication types