Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 4;18(11):e0012633.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012633. eCollection 2024 Nov.

Variable effects of transient Wolbachia infections on alphaviruses in Aedes aegypti

Affiliations

Variable effects of transient Wolbachia infections on alphaviruses in Aedes aegypti

Brittany L Dodson et al. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. .

Abstract

Wolbachia pipientis (= Wolbachia) has promise as a tool to suppress virus transmission by Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. However, Wolbachia can have variable effects on mosquito-borne viruses. This variation remains poorly characterized, yet the multimodal effects of Wolbachia on diverse pathogens could have important implications for public health. Here, we examine the effects of transient somatic infection with two strains of Wolbachia (wAlbB and wMel) on the alphaviruses Sindbis virus (SINV), O'nyong-nyong virus (ONNV), and Mayaro virus (MAYV) in Ae. aegypti. We found variable effects of Wolbachia including enhancement and suppression of viral infections, with some effects depending on Wolbachia strain. Both wAlbB- and wMel-infected mosquitoes showed enhancement of SINV infection rates one week post-infection, with wAlbB-infected mosquitoes also having higher viral titers than controls. Infection rates with ONNV were low across all treatments and no significant effects of Wolbachia were observed. The effects of Wolbachia on MAYV infections were strikingly strain-specific; wMel strongly blocked MAYV infections and suppressed viral titers, while wAlbB had more modest effects. The variable effects of Wolbachia on vector competence underscore the importance of further research into how this bacterium impacts the virome of wild mosquitoes including the emergent human pathogens they transmit.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Schematic of study design and timeline.
Adult Aedes aegypti females were somatically infected with Wolbachia (wAlbB or wMel) or a control solution via injection 2–5 days post-eclosion. Seven or eight days later, injected animals consumed a blood meal spiked with infectious alphavirus (ONNV, SINV, or MAYV). At 7 and 14 days post-blood feeding, viral titers were measured in three tissues. Wolbachia infection density was additionally quantified in SINV- and ONNV-exposed animals.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Effects of Wolbachia infection on SINV vector competence in Aedes aegypti.
(A) SINV body titers at 7 and 14 days post-infected blood meal. (B) SINV saliva titers at 7 and 14 days post-infected blood meal. Horizontal lines mark group medians. Groups were compared by Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn’s correction. ** P < 0.01.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Effects of Wolbachia infection on ONNV vector competence in Aedes aegypti.
(A) ONNV body titers at 7 and 14 days post-infected blood meal. (B) ONNV saliva titers at 7 and 14 days post-infected blood meal. Horizontal lines mark group medians. Groups were compared by Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn’s correction. There were no significant differences between groups.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Effects of Wolbachia infection on MAYV vector competence in Aedes aegypti.
(A) MAYV body titers at 7 and 14 days post-infected blood meal. (B) MAYV leg titers at 7 and 14 days post-infected blood meal. (C) MAYV saliva titers at 7 and 14 days post-infected blood meal. A-D: Horizontal lines mark group medians. Groups were compared by Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn’s correction. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, **** P < 0.0001.

Update of

References

    1. World Health Organization. A global brief on vector-borne diseases. 2014. Geneva. Retrieved from www.who.int
    1. Kilpatrick AM, Randolph SE. Drivers, dynamics, and control of emerging vector-borne zoonotic diseases. Lancet. 2012;380: 1946–1955. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61151-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tabachnick WJ. Challenges in predicting climate and environmental effects on vector-borne disease episystems in a changing world. J Exp Biol. 2010;213: 946–954. doi: 10.1242/jeb.037564 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weaver SC, Reisen WK. Present and future arboviral threats. Antiviral Res. 2010;85: 328–345. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2009.10.008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campbell LP, Luther C, Moo-Llanes D, Ramsey JM, Danis-Lozano R, Peterson AT. Climate change influences on global distributions of dengue and chikungunya virus vectors. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370: 20140135. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0135 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Supplementary concepts

LinkOut - more resources