Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;105(12):e4459.
doi: 10.1002/ecy.4459. Epub 2024 Nov 4.

A modeling approach to forecast local demographic trends in metapopulations

Affiliations

A modeling approach to forecast local demographic trends in metapopulations

Thierry Chambert et al. Ecology. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Predicting animal population trajectories into the future has become a central exercise in both applied and fundamental ecology. Because demographic models classically assume population closure, they tend to provide inaccurate predictions when applied locally to interconnected subpopulations that are part of a larger metapopulation. Ideally, one should explicitly model dispersal among subpopulations, but in practice this is prevented by the difficulty of estimating dispersal rates in the wild. To forecast the local demography of connected subpopulations, we developed a new demographic model (hereafter, the two-scale model) that disentangles two processes occurring at different spatial scales. First, at the larger scale, a closed population model describes changes in metapopulation size over time. Second, total metapopulation size is redistributed among subpopulations, using time-varying proportionality parameters. This two-step approach ensures that the long-term growth of every subpopulation is constrained by the overall metapopulation growth rate. It implicitly accounts for the interconnectedness among subpopulations and avoids unrealistic trajectories. Using realistic simulations, we compared the performance of this new model with that of a classical closed population model at predicting subpopulations' trajectories over 30 years. While the classical model predicted future subpopulation sizes with an average bias of 30% and produced predictive errors sometimes >500%, the two-scale model showed very little bias (<3%) and never produced predictive errors >20%. We also applied both models to a real dataset on European shags (Gulosus aristotelis) breeding along the Atlantic coast of France. Again, the classical model predicted highly unrealistic growths, as large as a 200-fold increase over 30 years for some subpopulations. The two-scale model predicted very sensible growths, never larger than a threefold increase over the 30-year time horizon, which is more in accordance with this species' life history. This two-scale model provides an effective solution to forecast the local demography of connected subpopulations in the absence of data on dispersal rates. In this context, it is a better alternative than closed population models and a more parsimonious option than full-dispersal models. Because the only data required are simple counts, this model could be useful to many large-scale wildlife monitoring programs.

Keywords: dispersal; open‐population models; population viability analysis; predictive modeling; seabird demography; wildlife management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Example of demographic predictions, from a single simulated dataset, provided by (A) the classical closed population model, assuming independent growth among subpopulations; and (B) the two‐scale model. The classical model largely overestimates the growth of some subpopulations, while the two‐scale model provides accurate predictions.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Map of the 234 European shag colonies (dots) on the French Atlantic and Channel Sea coast. Each color corresponds to a subpopulation, which consists of one or several colonies. The delimitation of these subpopulations was based on the proximity of colonies to seven French offshore windfarms (green polygons) that have been authorized in the area (see Appendix S1).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Projections of European shag populations' trajectories from each model. Note the difference in scale of the y‐axis between the two graphs.

References

    1. Aebischer, N. J. 1995. “Philopatry and Colony Fidelity of Shags Phalacrocorax aristotelis on the East Coast of Britain.” Ibis 137: 11–18. 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1995.tb03214.x. - DOI
    1. Ahrestani, F. S. , Hebblewhite M., and Post E.. 2013. “The Importance of Observation Versus Process Error in Analyses of Global Ungulate Populations.” Scientific Reports 3: 3125. 10.1038/srep03125. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alex Smith, M. , and Green D. M.. 2005. “Dispersal and the Metapopulation Paradigm in Amphibian Ecology and Conservation: Are All Amphibian Populations Metapopulations?” Ecography 28: 110–128. 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.04042.x. - DOI
    1. Barlow, E. J. , Daunt F., Wanless S., and Reid J. M.. 2013. “Estimating Dispersal Distributions at Multiple Scales: Within‐Colony and among‐Colony Dispersal Rates, Distances and Directions in European Shags Phalacrocorax aristotelis .” Ibis 155: 762–778.
    1. Beissinger, S. R. , and McCullough D. R.. 2002. Population Viability Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

LinkOut - more resources