Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 16;10(20):e39356.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39356. eCollection 2024 Oct 30.

Examining the utilization of web-based discussion tools in teaching and learning organic chemistry in selected Rwandan secondary schools

Affiliations

Examining the utilization of web-based discussion tools in teaching and learning organic chemistry in selected Rwandan secondary schools

Aloys Iyamuremye et al. Heliyon. .

Abstract

In recent years, the teaching and learning of organic chemistry have frequently faced challenges due to limited student engagement and participation. Consequently, there is a growing demand for innovative teaching methods to tackle these issues. In this context, web-based discussions have emerged as a hopeful approach to enhance students' engagement and foster critical thinking skills. Therefore, the present study investigated the level of adoption of web-based discussion tools in teaching organic chemistry in Rwandan secondary schools for addressing the challenge of limited student engagement and participation. A quantitative research approach relying on a survey questionnaire was used to collect data from 133 secondary school chemistry teachers in Kamonyi and Gasabo districts. The findings indicate that 78 % of teachers do not use web-based discussion tools, while 22 % have integrated these tools into their teaching. The preferred platforms among users include WhatsApp groups, Google Docs, and Google Classroom. Additionally, the study highlights key organic chemistry topics such as alkanes, polymers, polymerization, and alcohol that can be effectively taught through these tools. Statistical analysis using ANCOVA did not show significant differences in the use of web-based discussion tools based on factors like school location, teachers' age, school ownership, and teaching experience, with p-values of 0.817, 0.234, 0.380, and 0.051, respectively. However, the borderline significance related to teaching experience (p = 0.051) suggests a potential trend. A significant difference was observed in terms of gender, with male teachers more likely to use these tools (p = 0.015). The study offers valuable insights into the factors influencing the adoption of web-based discussion tools in Rwanda, offering useful guidance for educators and curriculum developers to create more engaging and inclusive chemistry lessons.

Keywords: And active participation; Innovative teaching approaches; Learning experience; Organic chemistry; Utilization; Web-based discussion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Aloys Iyamuremye reports administrative support and writing assistance were provided by 10.13039/100017581University of Rwanda 10.13039/100018309College of Education. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Extent of using web-based discussion in teaching organic chemistry.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Current level of using web-based discussion in teaching and learning organic chemistry per week.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
ICT tool used by teachers during web-based discussion.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Web-based platforms used by teachers in teaching and learning organic chemistry.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Normality curve of data.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Organic chemistry concepts teachable via web-based discussion.

Similar articles

References

    1. Uworwabayeho A., Flink I., Nyirahabimana A., Peeraer J., Muhire I., Gasozi A.N. Developing the capacity of education local leaders for sustaining professional learning communities in Rwanda. Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open. 2020;2(1) doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100092. - DOI
    1. Bretz S.L. ACS Publications; 2001. Novak's Theory of Education: Human Constructivism and Meaningful Learning. - DOI
    1. Yan F., Talanquer V. Students' ideas about how and why chemical reactions happen: mapping the conceptual landscape. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2015;37(18):3066–3092. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2015.1121414. - DOI
    1. DeHaan R.L. The impending revolution in undergraduate science education. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 2005;14:253–269. doi: 10.1007/s10956-005-4425-3. - DOI
    1. Reid N., Shah I. The role of laboratory work in university chemistry. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2007;8(2):172–185. doi: 10.1039/B5RP90026C. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources