Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 17;7(6):487-490.
doi: 10.1002/iju5.12785. eCollection 2024 Nov.

A case of retrocaval ureter with robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction

Affiliations

A case of retrocaval ureter with robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction

Tomoaki Hakariya et al. IJU Case Rep. .

Abstract

Introduction: Retrocaval ureter is a rare congenital anomaly that causes ureteral obstruction. Because of the rarity of retrocaval ureter, only a few cases of open, laparoscopic, or robot-assisted surgery have been reported. We herein report a case of retrocaval ureter that was successfully reconstructed with robot-assisted surgery.

Case presentation: A 24-year-old woman was incidentally diagnosed with right hydronephrosis on ultrasonography. Computed tomography revealed retrocaval ureter, and the right hydronephrosis was attributed to the retrocaval ureter. The patient underwent robot-assisted right ureteral reconstruction in the left lateral decubitus position. No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred, and no right hydronephrosis was observed 6 months after the operation.

Conclusion: The present case demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of robot-assisted ureteral reconstruction for retrocaval ureter.

Keywords: hydronephrosis; retrocaval ureter; robotic surgery; robot‐assisted ureteral reconstruction; ureteroureteral anastomosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Contrast‐enhanced computed tomography revealed right hydronephrosis and dilatation of the upper right ureter. In addition, part of the right ureter was suspected to be positioned posterior to the inferior vena cava and to detour from the medial to lateral aspect of the inferior vena cava (yellow allow). (a) Coronal plane. (b) Axial plane. *Same site as the intraoperative findings.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schema of port placement.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Intraoperative findings. (a) Before reconstruction. The right ureter was positioned behind the IVC and descended medially to the IVC. (b) After reconstruction. After repositioning the ureter to run anterior to the IVC, ureteroureteral anastomosis was performed with 4‐0 Vicryl®. IVC, inferior vena cava. *Same site as the computed tomography findings.

References

    1. Temiz MZ, Nayak B, Aykan S et al. Laparoscopic and robotic transperitoneal repair of retrocaval ureter: a comparison of the surgical outcomes from two centres with a comprehensive literature review. J. Minim. Access Surg. 2020; 16: 115–120. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Matsuda T, Yasumoto R, Tsujino T. Laparoscopic treatment of a retrocaval ureter. Eur. Urol. 1996; 29: 115–118. - PubMed
    1. Yen JM, Lee LS, Cheng CWS. Conservative management of retrocaval ureter: a case series. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2015; 15: 93–95. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Al‐Hajjaj M, Tallaa M. Retrocaval ureter: a case report. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2021; 2021: rjaa596. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mugiya S, Suzuki K, Ohhira T, Un‐No T, Takayama T, Fujita K. Retroperitoneoscopic treatment of a retrocaval ureter. Int. J. Urol. 1999; 6: 419–422. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources