Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;56(1):2418963.
doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2418963. Epub 2024 Nov 5.

A deep learning approach for gastroscopic manifestation recognition based on Kyoto Gastritis Score

Affiliations

A deep learning approach for gastroscopic manifestation recognition based on Kyoto Gastritis Score

Ao Liu et al. Ann Med. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: The risk of gastric cancer can be predicted by gastroscopic manifestation recognition and the Kyoto Gastritis Score. This study aims to validate the applicability of AI approaches for recognizing gastroscopic manifestations according to the definition of Kyoto Gastritis Score, with the goal of improving early gastric cancer detection and reducing gastric cancer mortality.

Methods: In this retrospective study, 29013 gastric endoscopy images were collected and carefully annotated into five categories according to the Kyoto Gastritis Score, i.e. atrophy (A), diffuse redness (DR), enlarged folds (H), intestinal metaplasia (IM), and nodularity (N). As a multi-label recognition task, we propose a deep learning approach composed of five GAM-EfficientNet models, each performing a multiple classification to quantify gastroscopic manifestations, i.e. no presentation or the severity score 0-2. This approach was compared with endoscopists of varying years of experience in terms of accuracy, specificity, precision, recall, and F1 score.

Results: The approach demonstrated good performance in identifying the five manifestations of the Kyoto Gastritis Score, with an average accuracy, specificity, precision, recall, and F1 score of 78.70%, 91.92%, 80.23%, 78.70%, and 0.78, respectively. The average performance of five experienced endoscopists was 72.63%, 90.00%, 77.68%, 72.63%, and 0.73, while that of five less experienced endoscopists was 66.60%, 87.44%, 70.88%, 66.60%, and 0.66, respectively. The sample t-test indicates that the approach's average accuracy, specificity, precision, recall, and F1 score for identifying the five manifestations were significantly higher than those of less experienced endoscopists, experienced endoscopists, and all endoscopists on average (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the potential of deep learning approaches on gastric manifestation recognition over junior, even senior endoscopists. Thus, the deep learning approach holds potential as an auxiliary tool, although prospective validation is still needed to assess its clinical applicability.

Keywords: Kyoto Gastritis Score; deep learning; gastric cancer; gastroscopic manifestations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ao Liu, Xilin Zhang, Jiaxin Zhong, Zilu Wang, Zhenyang Ge, Zhong Wang, Xiaoya Fan, and Jing Zhang declare no conflict of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow chart of the experiment design.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Confusion matrix of prediction in the test dataset for DLKGS.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
ROC and P-R curves of the five models.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Representative examples of different manifestations with different scores (left) along with their feature heatmaps outputted by Grad-CAM for DLKGS (right). Since each image is annotated with 5 labels (each corresponding to one manifestation), identical images exist to represent different manifestations. For example, the image illustrating score 0 for manifestation A is also a representative image showing no presentation for manifestation DR. All representative images for A, DR, H, and N are WLI images, whereas for IM, both WLI images and NBI images are shown
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Comparison of gastroscopic manifestation recognition ability between DLKGS and endoscopists.

Similar articles

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. . Global cancer statistics 2020: globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. doi:10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cao W, Chen HD, Yu YW, et al. . Changing profiles of cancer burden worldwide and in china: a secondary analysis of the global cancer statistics 2020. Chin Med J (Engl). 2021;134(7):783–791. doi:10.1097/CM9.0000000000001474. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Katai H, Ishikawa T, Akazawa K, et al. . Five-year survival analysis of surgically resected gastric cancer cases in japan: a retrospective analysis of more than 100,000 patients from the nationwide registry of the Japanese gastric cancer association (2001-2007). Gastric Cancer Off J Int Gastric Cancer Assoc Jpn Gastric Cancer Assoc. 2018;21(1):144–154. doi:10.1007/s10120-017-0716-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Suzuki H, Ono H, Hirasawa T, et al. . Long-term survival after endoscopic resection for gastric cancer: real-world evidence from a multicenter prospective cohort. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc. 2023;21(2):307–318.e2. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.029. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smyth EC, Nilsson M, Grabsch HI, et al. . Gastric cancer. Lancet Lond Engl. 2020;396(10251):635–648. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31288-5. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources