Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov-Dec;28(6):101135.
doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101135. Epub 2024 Nov 4.

Priorities in physical therapy research: A scoping review

Affiliations

Priorities in physical therapy research: A scoping review

Sara Souto-Miranda et al. Braz J Phys Ther. 2024 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Background: Physical therapy is an ever-evolving profession. To improve research efficiency, it is crucial to identify knowledge gaps and establish research priorities.

Objective: To review priorities for physical therapy research, and to summarize the evidence into a global research agenda. As a secondary aim we sought to compare the priorities across studies.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review with searches in PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to gather studies and grey literature. Studies were included if they involved physical therapists, physical therapy researchers, patients, or policymakers who determined a research agenda or conducted a study on priority setting in physical therapy research. Content analysis was performed by two independent reviewers to gather research priorities into main topics for a global research agenda.

Results: Twenty-five records were included, most being original articles (n = 19), from high-income countries (n = 25). Nine studies established generic priorities for physical therapy research, while the remaining were dedicated to physical therapy specific fields. A total of 551 priorities were established since 2000 for general physical therapy and 7 specific physical therapy areas. A global research agenda was established with 9 priority categories for future research. Cost and effectiveness studies were the more frequently prioritized research priorities.

Conclusion: This review synthesized the literature on priorities for physical therapy research and provided a global physical therapy research agenda. These 9 priority categories can now be used to design future physical therapy studies and channel research efforts into questions that are relevant for multiple stakeholders and nationalities.

Keywords: Physical therapy research; Priorities for physical therapy; Research agenda.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no competing interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of included studies (n = 25).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Global research agenda for physical therapy with 9 research priorities resultant from content analysis of 25 documents with research priority setting for physical therapy.

References

    1. Jesus T.S., Gianola S., Castellini G., Colquhoun H., Brooks D. Evolving trends in physiotherapy research publications between 1995 and 2015. Physiother Can. 2020;72(2):122–131. - PMC - PubMed
    1. APA. Value of Physiotherapy in Australia. Australian Physiotherapy Association;2020.
    1. Yang M., Bishop A., Sussex J., Roland M., Jowett S., Wilson E.C.F. Economic evaluation of patient direct access to NHS physiotherapy services. Physiotherapy. 2021;111:40–47. - PubMed
    1. APTA. The Economic Value of Physical Therapy in the United States. 2023.
    1. Chalmers I., Bracken M.B., Djulbegovic B., et al. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet. 2014;383(9912):156–165. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources