Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct;28(4):243-251.
doi: 10.7874/jao.2024.00458. Epub 2024 Oct 10.

Understanding Standard Procedure in Auditory Brainstem Response: Importance of Normative Data

Affiliations

Understanding Standard Procedure in Auditory Brainstem Response: Importance of Normative Data

Chanbeom Kwak et al. J Audiol Otol. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

The auditory brainstem response (ABR) is a noninvasive test that measures neural activity in response to auditory stimuli. Racial differences in head shape have provided strong evidence for specific normative data and accurate device calibration. International standards emphasize the need for standardized procedures and references. This study aimed to outline the standard procedure and related normative ABR values. Standard procedures were performed according to International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standards. Five studies from two countries were included to compare the normative values of the ABR. The dataset from the National Standard Reference Data Center (NSRDC) was used as reference. Normative values were described in terms of stimuli, latency, and amplitude. For click stimuli, the latency of the ABR showed different patterns across populations, such as those from Korea and the USA. Although the latencies reported by the NSRDC and for Koreans were relatively short, those reported for USA populations were longer. Using clicks, it was shown that the USA population had the largest ABR amplitude compared to those reported for the other two datasets. For Wave V latency using tone bursts, a similar pattern was identified with click stimuli. Frequency-specific trends were also observed. Although there is a lack of ABR datasets, the information and insights of the present study could be utilized as standard guidelines in research on ABR.

Keywords: Auditory brainstem response; Hearing tests; Normative data; Standardization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Block diagram of the auditory brainstem responses device.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Latency of auditory brainstem response using click stimuli for a series of waveforms across the countries.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Amplitude of auditory brainstem response using click stimuli for a series of waveforms across the countries.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Latency of auditory brainstem response using tone burst stimuli for a series of frequencies across the countries.

Similar articles

References

    1. Sininger YS. Auditory brain stem response for objective measures of hearing. Ear Hear. 1993;14:23–30. - PubMed
    1. Suthakar K, Liberman MC. A simple algorithm for objective threshold determination of auditory brainstem responses. Hear Res. 2019;381:107782. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Verhulst S, Jagadeesh A, Mauermann M, Ernst F. Individual differences in auditory brainstem response wave characteristics: relations to different aspects of peripheral hearing loss. Trends Hear. 2016;20:2331216516672186. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Turner K, Moshtaghi O, Saez N, Richardson M, Djalilian H, Zeng FG, et al. Auditory brainstem response wave I amplitude has limited clinical utility in diagnosing tinnitus in humans. Brain Sci. 2022;12:142. - PMC - PubMed
    1. van der Drift JF, Brocaar MP, van Zanten GA. The relation between the pure-tone audiogram and the click auditory brainstem response threshold in cochlear hearing loss. Audiology. 1987;26:1–10. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources