Incidence and Long-Term Implications of Type 2 Endoleak after Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic and Aortoiliac Aneurysms
- PMID: 39502347
- PMCID: PMC11534471
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1771344
Incidence and Long-Term Implications of Type 2 Endoleak after Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic and Aortoiliac Aneurysms
Abstract
Type 2 endoleak has been proved not to significantly increase the risk of aneurysm rupture. However, it is associated with aneurysm enlargement and may require secondary interventions. Its role has been widely investigated, but a definitive consensus about its management has still not been obtained. We performed a retrospective, single-center observational study that investigates the incidence of type 2 endoleak and its implications in the long-term follow-up in all the patients who underwent endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm from 2011 to 2016 at our institution. A total of 216 patients who underwent EVAR during the specified time period were enrolled, and 85 of them (39%) developed type 2 endoleak in their follow-up. Thirty-one of the patients who developed type 2 endoleak faced an aneurysm sac growth > 10 mm and required secondary intervention. Only nine of them showed resolution of the leak. In the long-term follow-up, patients who developed type 2 endoleak after EVAR did not show a significantly increased mortality compared with those who did not, but some of them required late open conversion due to aneurysm sac enlargement and some other developed a secondary type 1 endoleak which required correction. The management of type 2 endoleak remains debated, despite consensus exist regarding the need for intervention when a > 10-mm aneurysm sac growth is observed. Further studies are necessary to better define which are the "high-risk" type 2 endoleaks and identify the patients who would benefit more from correction.
Keywords: abdominal aortic aneurysm; aneurysm; coil embolization; endograft placement; endovascular procedure; endovascular repair; iliac artery disease.
International College of Angiology. This article is published by Thieme.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest None declared.
Figures
References
-
- Boyle J R, Mao J, Beck A W et al.Editor's Choice - variation in intact abdominal aortic aneurysm repair outcomes by country: analysis of International Consortium of Vascular Registries 2010 - 2016. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021;62(01):16–24. - PubMed
-
- Dutch Randomized Endovascular Aneurysm Management (DREAM)Trial Group . Prinssen M, Verhoeven E L, Buth J et al.A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(16):1607–1618. - PubMed
-
- OVER Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group . Lederle F A, Kyriakides T C, Stroupe K T et al.Open versus endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(22):2126–2135. - PubMed
-
- ENGAGE investigators . Dijkstra M L, Zeebregts C J, Verhagen H JM et al.Incidence, natural course, and outcome of type II endoleaks in infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repair based on the ENGAGE registry data. J Vasc Surg. 2020;71(03):780–789. - PubMed
-
- Esvs Guidelines Committee . Wanhainen A, Verzini F, Van Herzeele I et al.Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 clinical practice guidelines on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57(01):8–93. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
