Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct;27(5):323-333.
doi: 10.4048/jbc.2024.0180.

Risk of Lymphedema After Sentinel Node Biopsy in Patients With Breast Cancer

Affiliations

Risk of Lymphedema After Sentinel Node Biopsy in Patients With Breast Cancer

Jinyoung Byeon et al. J Breast Cancer. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: Although numerous studies have identified potential risk factors for ipsilateral lymphedema development in patients with breast cancer following axillary node dissection, the risk factors for lymphedema in patients undergoing sentinel node biopsy without axillary dissection remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to determine the real-world incidence and risk factors for lymphedema in such patients.

Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective review of medical records of patients with breast cancer who underwent sentinel node biopsy alone. The development cohort (5,051 patients, January 2017-December 2020) was analyzed to identify predictors of lymphedema, and a predictive model was subsequently created. A validation cohort (1,627 patients, January 2014-December 2016) was used to validate the model.

Results: In the development cohort, 49 patients (0.9%) developed lymphedema over a median follow-up of 56 months, with most cases occurring within the first three years post-operation. Multivariate analysis revealed that a body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m² or above, radiation therapy (RTx), chemotherapy, and more than three harvested lymph nodes significantly predicted lymphedema. The predictive model showed an area under the curve of 0.824 for systemic chemotherapy, with the number of harvested lymph nodes being the most significant factor. Patients were stratified into four risk groups, showing lymphedema incidences of 3.3% in the highest-risk group and 0.1% in the lowest-risk group. In the validation cohort, the incidences were 1.7% and 0.2% for the highest and lowest risk groups, respectively.

Conclusion: The lymphedema prediction model identifies RTx, chemotherapy, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m², and more than three harvested lymph nodes as significant risk factors. Although the overall incidence is low, the risk is notably influenced by the extent of lymph node removal and systemic therapies. The model's high negative predictive value supports its application in designing tailored lymphedema surveillance programs for early intervention.

Keywords: Lymphedema; Predictive Value of Tests; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Han-Byoel Lee and Wonshik Han are members of the board of directors and have stock and ownership interests at DCGen Co., Ltd. Other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Receiver operating characteristic curve.
Receiver operating characteristic curves for different coefficient contributions to lymphedema: (A) development set (AUC, 0.824; 95% CI, 0.780–0.869) and (B) internal validation set (AUC, 0.726; 95% CI, 0.597–0.895). AUC = area under the curve; CI = confidence interval.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Predicting lymphedema risk.
(A) Intergrated model of predicting lymphedema risk. Incidence of lymphedema by risk groups (B) in development cohort and (C) in validation cohort (a comparison between the groups used for creating the lymphedema prediction development group, in validation group). BMI↑ = body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2; BMI↓ = body mass index < 30 kg/m2; RTx = radiation therapy; LN = the number of harvested lymph nodes; CTx = neoadjuvant chemotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. DiSipio T, Rye S, Newman B, Hayes S. Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:500–515. - PubMed
    1. Kell MR, Burke JP, Barry M, Morrow M. Outcome of axillary staging in early breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;120:441–447. - PubMed
    1. McLaughlin SA, Wright MJ, Morris KT, Giron GL, Sampson MR, Brockway JP, et al. Prevalence of lymphedema in women with breast cancer 5 years after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary dissection: objective measurements. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5213–5219. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Del Bianco P, Zavagno G, Burelli P, Scalco G, Barutta L, Carraro P, et al. Morbidity comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy versus conventional axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer patients: results of the sentinella-GIVOM Italian randomised clinical trial. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:508–513. - PubMed
    1. Gärtner R, Jensen MB, Kronborg L, Ewertz M, Kehlet H, Kroman N. Self-reported arm-lymphedema and functional impairment after breast cancer treatment--a nationwide study of prevalence and associated factors. Breast. 2010;19:506–515. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources