Vestibular Schwannoma Koos Grade I International Study of Active Surveillance Versus Stereotactic Radiosurgery: The VISAS-K1 Study
- PMID: 39503441
- DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003215
Vestibular Schwannoma Koos Grade I International Study of Active Surveillance Versus Stereotactic Radiosurgery: The VISAS-K1 Study
Abstract
Background and objective: This investigation evaluates the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) vs observation for Koos grade I vestibular schwannomas (VS).
Methods: In a multicenter study, we retrospectively analyzed data of patients with Koos grade I VS who underwent SRS (SRS group) or were observed (observation group). Propensity score matching was used to equilibrate demographics, tumor size, and audiometric data across groups. The outcome analyzed included tumor control, preservation of serviceable hearing, and neurological function.
Results: The study matched 142 patients, providing a median follow-up period of 36 months. SRS significantly enhanced tumor control compared with observation, with a 100% control rate at both 5- and 8-year marks in the SRS group vs 48.6% and 29.5% in the observation group at the same time intervals, respectively ( P < .001). Preservation of serviceable hearing outcomes between groups showed no significant difference at 5 and 8 years, ensuring a comparable quality of auditory function (SRS 70.1% vs observation 53.4% at 5 years; P = .33). Furthermore, SRS was associated with a reduced likelihood of tinnitus (odds ratio [OR] = 0.46, P = .04), vestibular dysfunction (OR = 0.17, P = .002), and overall cranial nerve dysfunction (OR = 0.49, P = .03) at last follow-up.
Conclusion: SRS management of patients with Koos grade I VS was associated with superior tumor control and reduced odds for cranial nerve dysfunction, while not compromising hearing preservation compared with observation. These findings support the safety and efficacy of SRS as a primary care approach for this patient population.
Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2024. All rights reserved.
References
-
- Thomsen J, Charabi S, Tos M, Mantoni M, Charabi B. Intracanalicular vestibular schwannoma—therapeutic options. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2000;543:38-40.
-
- Barnes JH, Patel NS, Lohse CM, Tombers NM, Link MJ, Carlson ML. Impact of treatment on vestibular schwannoma-associated symptoms: a prospective study comparing treatment modalities. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021;165(3):458-464.
-
- Ostler B, Killeen DE, Reisch J, et al. Patient demographics influencing vestibular schwannoma size and initial management plans. World Neurosurg. 2020;136:e440-e446.
-
- Bird PA, MacFarlane MR. Management of unilateral vestibular schwannoma/acoustic neuroma. N Z Med J. 2007;120(1265):U2805.
-
- Lund-Johansen M. Treatment of small and medium-sized vestibular schwannoma-a need for better evidence. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2019;161(1):87-89.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical