Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes in Type 1 Thyroplasty Comparing Silastic to Gore-Tex
- PMID: 39503469
- DOI: 10.1002/lary.31867
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes in Type 1 Thyroplasty Comparing Silastic to Gore-Tex
Abstract
Objective: Type 1 Thyroplasty is a well-established procedure used for medializing an immobile vocal fold. Silastic and Gore-Tex are the two most common materials used to accomplish this, but comparative data on their relative efficacy are scarce. We sought to compare outcomes between Silastic and Gore-Tex implants via systematic review and meta-analysis for unilateral vocal fold immobility.
Methods: We collected available data from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science on demographics, maximum phonation time (MPT), voice handicap index (VHI-10/30) score, and any other relevant metrics encountered before comparatively evaluating differences in outcomes.
Results: The search yielded 1,534 records with 55 manuscripts ultimately included. There were 41 unique studies that utilized Silastic for a total of 1038 patients. There were 13 unique studies that utilized Gore-Tex for a total of 245 patients. The pooled mean increase in MPT for Silastic patients was 7.8 s (+1.3 SMD) compared with 5.7 s for Gore-Tex (+1.6 SMD). There was significant publication bias present in both analyses. The pooled mean change in VHI-30 with Silastic was -45.4 (62.2%, -2.09 SMD) compared with -51.6 (73.5%, -1.1 SMD) with Gore-Tex. The pooled mean change in VHI-10 with Silastic was -15.6 (54%, -0.46 SMD) compared with -11.6 (43%, -0.86 SMD) with Gore-Tex. There was no significant publication bias present in VHI outcomes.
Conclusions: Silicone and Gore-Tex implants provide adequate and comparable results in TT1. The data supporting this conclusion are limited by follow-up, diversity in outcomes, limited data availability, and publication bias. Future research should be dedicated to comparing implants in a well-randomized environment. Laryngoscope, 135:1236-1247, 2025.
Keywords: Gore‐Tex; Silastic; Thyroplasty; glottic insufficiency; medialization laryngoplasty; meta‐analysis; systematic review; vocal fold medialization.
© 2024 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.
References
BIBLIOGRAPHY
-
- Tucker HM. Vocal cord paralysis – 1979: etiology and management. Laryngoscope. 1980;90(4):585‐590. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-198004000-00004.
-
- Isshiki N, Morita H, Okamura M. Thyroplasty as a new phonosurgical technique. Acta Otolaryngol. 1974;78:451‐457.
-
- Suehiro A, Hirano S, Kishimoto Y, Tanaka S, Ford CN. Comparative study of vocal outcomes with silicone versus Gore‐Tex Thyroplasty. Ann Otol RhinolLaryngol. 2009;118(6):405‐408. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940911800602.
-
- Atallah I, Manjunath M, Castellanos PF. Transoral silastic medialization for unilateral vocal fold paralysis. Head Neck. 2019;41(9):2947‐2951. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.25774.
-
- Malik A, Ramalingam WVBS, Nilakantan A, Nair S, Ramesh AV, Raj P. Comparison of the use of silastic with titanium prefabricated implant in type I thyroplasty. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;80(2):156‐160. https://doi.org/10.5935/1808-8694.20140032.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
