Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 12;13(12):e0065724.
doi: 10.1128/mra.00657-24. Epub 2024 Nov 6.

Draft genome of Bacillus velezensis CMRP6330, a suitable biocontrol agent for disease management in crops

Affiliations

Draft genome of Bacillus velezensis CMRP6330, a suitable biocontrol agent for disease management in crops

Gustavo Manoel Teixeira et al. Microbiol Resour Announc. .

Abstract

As a biological alternative to managing diseases in crop production, we highlight the Bacillus velezensis strain LABIM41 (CMRP6330). Its genome, composed of 3,970,959 bp, possesses a rich metabolic machinery and a wide range of molecules with different biological activities and roles in its symbiotic relationship with its plant hosts.

Keywords: Bacillus velezensis; biocontrol agent; crop production; genomics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Antagonistic activity of Bacillus velezensis CMRP6330 on phytopathogenic fungi mycelial growth. The experiment was conducted on 90-mm plates with PDA culture medium. The fungi used were (A) Colletotrichum truncatum, (B) Cercospora kikuchii, (C) Macrophomina phaseolina, and (D) Sclerotinia sclerotiorum; the images above show the control of mycelial growth of the respective fungi. For each of the experiments, the top plates show the B. velezensis CMRP6330 inoculated (black arrow) with the different fungi (red arrow), and the bottom plates show the growth of the fungi in the absence of B. velezensis CMRP6330.

References

    1. Hodkinson BP, Grice EA. 2015. Next-generation sequencing: a review of technologies and tools for wound microbiome research. Adv Wound Care 4:50–58. doi:10.1089/wound.2014.0542 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Koren S, Phillippy AM. 2015. One chromosome, one contig: complete microbial genomes from long-read sequencing and assembly. Curr Opin Microbiol 23:110–120. doi:10.1016/j.mib.2014.11.014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang J, Chiodini R, Badr A, Zhang G. 2011. The impact of next-generation sequencing on genomics. J Genet Genom 38:95–109. doi:10.1016/j.jgg.2011.02.003 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sansinenea E, Ortiz A. 2011. Secondary metabolites of soil Bacillus spp. Biotechnol Lett 33:1523–1538. doi:10.1007/s10529-011-0617-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tyc O, Song C, Dickschat JS, Vos M, Garbeva P. 2017. The ecological role of volatile and soluble secondary metabolites produced by soil bacteria. Trends Microbiol 25:280–292. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2016.12.002 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources