Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2443648.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.43648.

Methylphenidate and Atomoxetine in Pregnancy and Possible Adverse Fetal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Methylphenidate and Atomoxetine in Pregnancy and Possible Adverse Fetal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ester di Giacomo et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Erratum in

  • Error in Abstract, Results, and Figure.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e2510141. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.10141. JAMA Netw Open. 2025. PMID: 40198075 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Importance: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common neurobehavioral disorders, and it afflicts about 7% of young people. As a consequence, many young women might be pregnant while taking medication for ADHD, but data about safety have not yet been strictly examined.

Objective: To examine adverse effects in offspring of mothers receiving treatment with atomoxetine and methylphenidate during pregnancy.

Data sources: Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO) were searched for articles published through December 31, 2023, with the following search terms: (atomoxetine OR methylphenidate) AND (pregnancy).

Study selection: Observational studies (eg, cohort studies, case-control studies, case-crossover studies, cross-sectional studies, and registry-based studies) that reported offspring outcomes in pregnancy with atomoxetine and/or methylphenidate and in mothers with ADHD but unexposed to ADHD treatment during pregnancy or from the general population were included. Ten studies of 656 records satisfied criteria.

Data extraction and synthesis: Two independent reviewers performed data extraction according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Meta-analyses were conducted based on reported odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% CIs using a linear random effects model. Each study was inversely weighted by the reported variance of the estimators. Risk of publication bias and analysis of heterogeneity through univariate and multivariate metaregressions were also rated. Data were analyzed from January to March 2024.

Main outcomes and measures: Study outcomes included miscarriages and congenital anomalies.

Results: Ten studies involving 16 621 481 pregnant women, 30 830 of them affected by ADHD, were included. Congenital anomalies or miscarriages were not more frequent in offspring of mothers receiving treatment with methylphenidate or atomoxetine during pregnancy compared with unexposed offspring (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.83-1.55; P = .41; I2 = 8% for congenital anomalies; OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.70-1.47; P = .96; I2 = 0% for miscarriages) or compared with the general population (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.93-1.53; P = .16; I2 = 74% for congenital anomalies; OR, 1.05, 95% CI, 0.81-1.37; P = .70; I2 = 0% for miscarriage).

Conclusions and relevance: Evidence from this meta-analysis, which involves a substantial sample of pregnant women with and without ADHD, suggests the maintenance of methylphenidate or atomoxetine during pregnancy is safe, given that congenital anomalies and miscarriages did not appear to significantly increase. Further studies are recommended to support and confirm these findings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. PRISMA Flow Chart
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Exposed Group vs Unexposed Group
Different box sizes indicate study weight. NA indicates not applicable; OR, odds ratio.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Exposed Group vs General Population (GP)
Forest plot of comparison: congenital anomalies in exposed group vs general population. Different box sizes indicate study weight. NA indicates not applicable; OR, odds ratio.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Unexposed vs General Population (GP)
Forest plot of comparison: congenital anomalies in unexposed group vs general population. Different box sizes indicate study weight. NA indicates not applicable; OR, odds ratio.

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. American Psychiatric Association; 1994.
    1. Thomas R, Sanders S, Doust J, Beller E, Glasziou P. Prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2015;135(4):e994-e1001. doi:10.1542/peds.2014-3482 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ramos-Quiroga JA, Montoya A, Kutzelnigg A, Deberdt W, Sobanski E. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in the European adult population: prevalence, disease awareness, and treatment guidelines. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013;29(9):1093-1104. doi:10.1185/03007995.2013.812961 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kessler RC, Adler L, Barkley R, et al. . The prevalence and correlates of adult ADHD in the United States: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(4):716-723. doi:10.1176/ajp.2006.163.4.716 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ornoy A, Koren G. The effects of drugs used for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) on pregnancy outcome and breast-feeding: a critical review. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2021;19(11):1794-1804. doi:10.2174/1570159x18666201127164000 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances