Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2025 Jan 1;160(1):74-84.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5024.

Routine Imaging or Symptomatic Follow-Up After Resection of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Collaborators, Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Routine Imaging or Symptomatic Follow-Up After Resection of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Paul C M Andel et al. JAMA Surg. .

Erratum in

  • Error in Author Affiliation and Name.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] JAMA Surg. 2025 Jan 1;160(1):115. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.6210. JAMA Surg. 2025. PMID: 39774612 No abstract available.

Abstract

Importance: International guidelines lack consistency in their recommendations regarding routine imaging in the follow-up after pancreatic resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Consequently, follow-up strategies differ between centers worldwide.

Objective: To compare clinical outcomes, including recurrence-focused treatment and survival, in patients with PDAC recurrence who received symptomatic follow-up or routine imaging after pancreatic resection in international centers affiliated with the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (E-AHPBA).

Design, setting, and participants: This was a prospective, international, cross-sectional study. Patients from a total of 33 E-AHPBA centers from 13 countries were included between 2020 and 2021. According to the predefined study protocol, patients who underwent PDAC resection and were diagnosed with disease recurrence were prospectively included. Patients were stratified according to postoperative follow-up strategy: symptomatic follow-up (ie, without routine imaging) or routine imaging.

Exposures: Symptomatic follow-up or routine imaging in patients who underwent PDAC resection.

Main outcomes and measures: Overall survival (OS) was estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using the log-rank test. To adjust for potential confounders, multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between follow-up strategy and recurrence-focused treatment. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to study the independent association between follow-up strategy and OS.

Results: Overall, 333 patients (mean [SD] age, 65 [11] years; 184 male [55%]) with PDAC recurrence were included. Median (IQR) follow-up at time of analysis 2 years after inclusion of the last patient was 40 (30-58) months. Of the total cohort, 98 patients (29%) received symptomatic follow-up, and 235 patients (71%) received routine imaging. OS was 23 months (95% CI, 19-29 months) vs 28 months (95% CI, 24-30 months) in the groups who received symptomatic follow-up vs routine imaging, respectively (P = .01). Routine imaging was associated with receiving recurrence-focused treatment (adjusted odds ratio, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.22-5.41; P = .01) and prolonged OS (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.56-.99; P = .04).

Conclusion and relevance: In this international, prospective, cross-sectional study, routine follow-up imaging after pancreatic resection for PDAC was independently associated with receiving recurrence-focused treatment and prolonged OS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Intven reported receiving personal fees from Elekta outside the submitted work. Dr de Meijer reported receiving grants from ZonMW Veni, Health~Holland PPP Allowance, and NVGE Research Grant outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

References

    1. Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(1):12-49. Published online January 17, 2024. doi:10.3322/caac.21820 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Groot VP, Blair AB, Gemenetzis G, et al. . Recurrence after neoadjuvant therapy and resection of borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45(9):1674-1683. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2019.04.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Daamen LA, Groot VP, Intven MPW, et al. ; Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group . Postoperative surveillance of pancreatic cancer patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45(10):1770-1777. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2019.05.031 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Groot VP, Rezaee N, Wu W, et al. . Patterns, timing, and predictors of recurrence following pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2018;267(5):936-945. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002234 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bengtsson A, Andersson R, Ansari D. The actual 5-year survivors of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma based on real-world data. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):16425. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-73525-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types