Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2025 Jan;13(1):79-88.e4.
doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.10.029. Epub 2024 Nov 4.

Bee/Vespula Venom-Specific IgE Ratio Greater Than 5:1 Indicates Culprit Insect in Double-Sensitized Patients

Affiliations
Free article
Observational Study

Bee/Vespula Venom-Specific IgE Ratio Greater Than 5:1 Indicates Culprit Insect in Double-Sensitized Patients

Simon Tischler et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2025 Jan.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Venom-allergic patients are frequently double-sensitized to honeybee venom (BV) and Vespula venom (VV). Genuine double allergy is uncommon.

Objectives: To assess whether a quantitative comparison of BV- and VV-specific IgE levels permits an identification of the culprit venom in double-sensitized patients, and to evaluate whether independent sensitization to BV- and VV-specific components corresponds to an indication for double immunotherapy.

Methods: This single-center observational study evaluated 1,069 consecutive patients; 490 nonallergic controls were available for statistical comparison. The diagnosis (BV allergy, VV allergy, or double allergy) was based on a comprehensive allergological workup including patient history, IgE serology, intradermal skin test, and, when required, basophil activation testing. Quantitative allergen-specific IgE to BV, VV, rApi m 1, and rVes v 5 was retrospectively compared with the final diagnosis. The ratio of BV/VV-specific IgE levels was considered in double-sensitized venom-allergic patients.

Results: Sensitization to whole-venom preparations and components was frequent in patients and asymptomatic controls, with higher specific IgE levels in the patient group. At least 5:1 dominance of the specific IgE to either BV or VV was documented in 239 of 459 double-sensitized venom-allergic patients (52.1%). Of these patients 232 (97.1%) received a diagnosis of monoallergy to only the venom to which they were dominantly sensitized.

Conclusions: Dominant specific IgE at a ratio of 5:1 indicates the culprit venom in double-sensitized allergic patients. Additional component-resolved diagnostic testing can be restricted to cases with double sensitization to whole venom at a ratio of less than 5:1. Double sensitization to rApi m 1 and rVes v 5 per se does not justify double venom immunotherapy.

Keywords: Allergy testing; Api m 1; Asymptomatic; Component; Double allergy; Double sensitization; Hymenoptera; IgE; Insect venom; Ves v 5.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources