Cardiotoxicity following thoracic radiotherapy for lung cancer
- PMID: 39506136
- PMCID: PMC11833127
- DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02888-0
Cardiotoxicity following thoracic radiotherapy for lung cancer
Erratum in
-
Correction: Cardiotoxicity following thoracic radiotherapy for lung cancer.Br J Cancer. 2025 Mar;132(4):401-407. doi: 10.1038/s41416-024-02926-x. Br J Cancer. 2025. PMID: 39775164 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Radiotherapy is the standard of care treatment for unresectable NSCLC, combined with concurrent chemotherapy and adjuvant immunotherapy. Despite technological advances in radiotherapy planning and delivery, the risk of damage to surrounding thoracic tissues remains high. Cardiac problems, including arrhythmia, heart failure and ischaemic events, occur in 20% of patients with lung cancer who undergo radiotherapy. As survival rates improve incrementally for this cohort, minimising the cardiovascular morbidity of RT is increasingly important. Problematically, the reporting of cardiac endpoints has been poor in thoracic radiotherapy clinical trials, and retrospective studies have been limited by the lack of standardisation of nomenclature and endpoints. How baseline cardiovascular profile and cardiac substructure radiation dose distribution impact the risk of cardiotoxicity is incompletely understood. As Thoracic Oncology departments seek to expand the indications for radiotherapy, and as the patient cohort becomes older and more comorbid, there is a pressing need for cardiotoxicity to be comprehensively characterised with sophisticated oncology, physics and cardio-oncology evaluations. This review synthesises the evidence base for cardiotoxicity in conventional radiotherapy, focusing on lung cancer, including current data, unmet clinical needs, and future scientific directions.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: GW – Speaker honorarium (Astra Zeneca). CB – no relevant relationships to declare. JM – Research support (Myocardial Solutions, Abbott Laboratories), modest consulting fees (Alnylam, Altathera, Bridgebio, Pfizer and Race Oncology). SR – no relevant relationships to declare. GH – Research support to institution (Varian Medical Systems, ViewRay, Mevion Medical Systems, Siemens Helathineers), consulting fees (Varian), Patents/Royalties/IP (pending patent, Varian Medical Systems). PS – Speaker honoraria (Varian Medical Systems). CR – Research support to institution (Merck, Varian Medical Systems), consulting fees (Varian Medical Systems, AstraZeneca, EMD Serono, Quantaras), Patents/Royalties/IP (Noninvasive imaging and treatment system for cardiac arrhythmias WO 2017078757 A1; U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/598, 162 Entitled System and method for determining segments for ablation), Leadership (Radialogica, EmpNia), Stock/Ownership (Radialogica, Quantaras, EmpNia).
Figures
References
-
- Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin 2024; 74. 10.3322/CAAC.21820. - PubMed
-
- Cancer Research UK. A cancer of substantial unmet need: why we’re making lung cancer a priority. 2015. https://news.cancerresearchuk.org/2015/07/20/a-cancer-of-substantial-unm... (accessed 3 Dec2022).
-
- Nygård L, Vogelius IR, Fischer BM, Kjær A, Langer SW, Aznar MC, et al. A Competing Risk Model of First Failure Site after Definitive Chemoradiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2018;13:559–67. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
