Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 6;24(1):432.
doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03940-5.

Risk factors for puncture-related complications after cerebrovascular angiography and neuroendovascular intervention with distal transradial approach

Affiliations

Risk factors for puncture-related complications after cerebrovascular angiography and neuroendovascular intervention with distal transradial approach

Weikai Wang et al. BMC Neurol. .

Abstract

Background and purpose: To determine the risk factors for puncture-related complications after the distal transradial approach (dTRA) for cerebrovascular angiography and neuroendovascular intervention and to explore the incidence and potential mechanisms of procedural failure and puncture-related complications.

Materials and methods: From February to November 2023, 62 patients underwent dTRA in our department. Demographic, clinical, and procedural data were collected retrospectively. Postoperative puncture-related complications were defined as a syndrome of major hematoma, minor hematoma, arterial spasm/occlusion, arteriovenous fistula, pseudoaneurysm, and neuropathy. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to identify significant factors contributing to puncture-related complications.

Results: Forty-five diagnostic cerebral angiograms and 17 neurointerventions were performed or attempted with dTRA in 62 patients. Procedural success was achieved via dTRA in 47 (75.8%) patients, whereas 15 (24.2%) required conversion to other approaches. Reasons for failure included puncture failure (n = 8), inability to cannulate due to arterial spasm (n = 6), and inadequate catheter support of the left vertebral artery (n = 1). 17.0% (8/47) of patients had postoperative puncture-related complications. Minor hematoma occurred in 8.5% (4/47) of patients, arterial spasm/occlusion in 6.3% (3/47), and neuropathy in 2.1% (1/47). No major complications were observed. On stepwise multivariable regression analysis, BMI (OR = 0.70, 95%CI 0.513 to 0.958; p = 0.026) was an independent risk factor for puncture-related complications, with a cut-off of 24.8 kg/m2 (sensitivity 66.7% and specificity 87.5%).

Conclusion: Our cohort is the first study of risk factors for puncture-related complications after neurointerventional interventions with dTRA. This study has shown that a low BMI (< 24.8 kg/m2) is independently associated with the development of puncture-related complications.

Keywords: Complications; Diagnostic cerebral angiography; Distal transradial approach; Risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distal radial artery puncture site (anatomical snuffbox area) and relevant surrounding anatomic structures. Vascular anatomy of the forearm and hand. B
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Preoperative assessments of forearm RA and dRA based on ultrasonography. A Diameter of the RA in the horizontal section. B Diameter of the dRA in the longitudinal section. RA, radial artery; dRA, distal radial artery
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Distal transradial approach technique. A The patient’s right hand is kept in a neutral position on the side-board, and the wrist is elevated using padding with the fingers curled. The entire forearm is sterilized (including the radial and ulnar artery puncture points). B An 18G needle was used to puncture the dRA in a single wall at 30° to 45°, and the blood spray at the tail of the needle was observed. (C, D) After ensuring backflow, a 018″ guidewire and a 6F radial sheath are gently inserted. (E, F) Place a small piece of gauze over the puncture site and roll it tightly with an elastic
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. (III) The AUC was 0.72 (95%CI, 0.668 to 0.769). The cut-off baseline value for BMI was set to 24.8 with specificity of 87.5% and sensitivity of 66.7%, respectively

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Romano DG, Frauenfelder G, Tartaglione S, et al. Trans-Radial Approach: technical and clinical outcomes in neurovascular procedures. CVIR Endovasc. 2020;3(1):58. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sinha SK, Jha MJ, Mishra V, et al. Radial Artery Occlusion - Incidence, Predictors and Long-term outcome after TRAnsradial Catheterization: clinico-Doppler ultrasound-based study (RAIL-TRAC study). Acta Cardiol. 2017;72(3):318–27. - PubMed
    1. Sgueglia GA, Lee BK, Cho BR, et al. Distal Radial Access: Consensus Report of the First Korea-Europe Transradial Intervention Meeting. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(8):892–906. - PubMed
    1. Brunet MC, Chen SH, Sur S, et al. Distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for diagnostic cerebral angiography. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019;11(7):710–3. - PubMed
    1. Patel P, Majmundar N, Bach I, et al. Distal Transradial Access in the Anatomic Snuffbox for Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40(9):1526–8. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources