Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 6;24(1):723.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06921-1.

Providers' perspective on vaginal birth after cesarean birth: a qualitative systematic review

Antita Kanjanakaew  1 , Atchareya Jiramanee  2 , Manassawee Srimoragot  2
Affiliations

Providers' perspective on vaginal birth after cesarean birth: a qualitative systematic review

Antita Kanjanakaew et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Birth (VBAC) is a birth mode recommended for reducing repeat cesarean which potentially contributes to adverse outcomes. However, VBAC is not normally practiced in some countries. Providers are an important part of the decision-making process on modes of birth among pregnant individuals. Providers' perspective on VBAC can influence whether they support or avoid conducting VBAC. This review aimed to explore providers' perspective on VBAC.

Methods: The comprehensive search was conducted from six databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google scholar. The studies published in English between 2013 and 2023 were review. The Medical Subject Heading terms for VBAC and perspective were used to search. The eligible studies were selected by the PRISMA flow chart. The initial search yielded 558 articles. After excluding duplicates, articles not retrieved for full-text, and not meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria, eight articles were recruited. Quality appraisal of the studies was performed by the tool of the Joanna Briggs Institute. The meta-aggregation approach was applied to synthesize the findings.

Results: Eight qualitative articles were included in this review, and six themes were developed including (1) different recognition of VBAC, (2) differences of willingness level of conducting Trial of Labor after Cesarean (TOLAC) (the approach attempting to have VBAC), (3) skills and resources needed when performing TOLAC, (4) protocol for recruiting candidacy and TOLAC management, (5) final decision making on VBAC, and (6) onset and duration of providing TOLAC information.

Conclusion: Providers play an important role in influencing individuals' decision on modes of birth. Providers' positive recognition and willingness of conducting TOLAC potentially impact successful VBAC rate. However, the lawsuit caused by adverse outcomes from TOLAC/VBAC is a main reason for choosing repeat cesarean.

Trial registration: PROSPERO registration number of this systematic review: CRD42023427662.

Keywords: Previous Cesarean; Qualitative Study; Review; VBAC.

Plain language summary

Repeat cesarean is a primary contributor to high cesarean rates globally. Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Birth (VBAC) is a vaginal birth of individuals with previous cesarean. While some countries have high successful VBAC rates, many countries have very low VBAC rates and do not support a vaginal birth in subsequent pregnancy among individuals with previous cesarean. Healthcare providers especially obstetricians and nurse-midwives play an important role in individuals’ decision on mode of birth, so do individuals with previous cesarean. Healthcare providers’ perspective on modes of birth among individuals with previous cesarean is very essential to support or not support individuals to have VBAC. In high VBAC rate countries, healthcare providers think VBAC is an optimal option for individuals with previous cesarean and have high confidence to do VBAC. On the other hand, healthcare providers in low VBAC rate countries think VBAC can cause a catastrophic birth outcome as uterine dehiscence and they are scared of being sued from the adverse outcome. One approach to support VBAC, most healthcare providers suggest that individuals with previous cesarean should be educated about VBAC right after the first cesarean or first antenatal visit because VBAC is not a common mode of birth for individuals in some countries and they need time to make a decision on mode of birth for their subsequent pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA diagram
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, Ye J, Mikolajczyk R, Deneux-Tharaux C, et al. What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies. Reprod Health. 2015;12(57):1–10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ye J, Betrán AP, Vela MG, Souza JP, Zhang J. Searching for the Optimal Rate of Medically Necessary Cesarean Delivery. Birth. 2014;41(3):237–44. - PubMed
    1. Antoine C, Young BK. Cesarean section one hundred years 1920–2020: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly. J Perinat Med. 2020;49(1):5–16. - PubMed
    1. Chongsuvivatwong V, Bachtiar H, Chowdhury ME, Fernando S, Suwanrath C, Kor-anantakul O, et al. Maternal and fetal mortality and complications associated with cesarean section deliveries in teaching hospitals in Asia. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010;36(1):45–51. - PubMed
    1. Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(6):1–8. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources