Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024;84(4):421.
doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12650-8. Epub 2024 Apr 23.

QCD challenges from pp to AA collisions: 4th edition

Affiliations
Review

QCD challenges from pp to AA collisions: 4th edition

Javira Altmann et al. Eur Phys J C Part Fields. 2024.

Abstract

This paper is a write-up of the ideas that were presented, developed and discussed at the fourth International Workshop on QCD Challenges from pp to AA, which took place in February 2023 in Padua, Italy. The goal of the workshop was to focus on some of the open questions in the field of high-energy heavy-ion physics and to stimulate the formulation of concrete suggestions for making progresses on both the experimental and theoretical sides. The paper gives a brief introduction to each topic and then summarizes the primary results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comparisons of current- and previous-generation gluon nuclear modification factors RpPbg in 208Pb from the (left) EPPS [20, 25] and (right) nNNPDF [19, 26] collaborations. The shaded regions show the 68%CL uncertainties. In both cases, the fit results shown in gray do not use LHCb D0 data [24], while the results shown in color do use these data
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
J/ψ photoproduction cross sections for γPb (left) from ALICE [49] and CMS [50] measured using nuclear breakup categories to unambiguously determine the energy dependence and for γp (right) from HERA and LHCb measurements versus NLO predictions [57]
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A compilation of recent jet substructure measurements indicating a narrowing of the jet core in heavy-ion collisions. From left-to-right the figures have been extracted from Refs. [–83]
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Left: fraction of core and corona as a function of multiplicity from pp to PbPb. Middle and right: integrated Ω/π yield ratio (middle) and average transverse momentum (right) as a function of charged-particle multiplicity density at midrapidity from pp to PbPb compared to EPOS 4.0.0 predictions from various parts of the collision system [121]. The “co+co” (core+corona) curve is an interpolation between the core and corona cases, with the core weight increasing continuously with multiplicity. The “full” case is equal to the co+co case with in addition the inclusion of hadron rescattering
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Pearson correlation coefficient ρ(c2{2},[pT]) as a function of multiplicity as measured by ATLAS [134] and CMS [135]
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Left: Baryon-to-meson ratios measured by ALICE [108], with approximate indications of the values measured at LEP (DELPHI [177]) superimposed. Right: proton-Λ correlations in azimuth [178]
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Charm hadron ratios vs. pT, data in comparison to models [14] (Catania: coalescence; TAMU, GSI-Hd: SHM, TAMU with enhanced charm-baryon spectrum, GSI-Hd with the PDG one)
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Left: charm hadron yields in central PbPb collisions, data [14] and SHM predictions. Note the scale factor of 30 for the J/ψ meson. Right: The difference between the v2 values of Λc+ and D0 as a function of pTas predicted by the Catania coalescence model and POWLANG
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Multiplicity dependence of the cross section ratio of χc1(3872) and ψ meson (left) and of the Tcc+ measured yield [192] (right)
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Compilation of muon measurements converted to the abstract z-scale for the hadronic interaction model EPOS-LHC. The z-scale is given by z=(ln(Nμ)-ln(Nμ,p))/(ln(Nμ,Fe)-ln(Nμ,p)), where Nμ is the measured muon content and Nμ,p and Nμ,Fe are predictions for proton and iron CRs, respectively. The energy scales of the experimental datasets shown here have been cross-calibrated as described in Ref. [256]. The expected value zmass based on the cosmic-ray mass composition estimated by the GSF model [257] is subtracted. Also shown are zmass values computed from Xmax measurements by the Pierre Auger Observatory (grey band)

References

    1. F. Karsch, Lattice simulations of the thermodynamics of strongly interacting elementary particles and the exploration of new phases of matter in relativistic heavy ion collisions. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 46, 122–131 (2006). 10.1088/1742-6596/46/1/017. arXiv:hep-lat/0608003 [hep-lat]
    1. S. Borsanyi et al., Is there still any formula image mystery in lattice QCD? Results with physical masses in the continuum limit III. JHEP 1009, 073 (2010). 10.1007/JHEP09(2010)073. arXiv:1005.3508 [hep-lat]
    1. S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, C. Hoelbling, S.D. Katz, S. Krieg et al., Full result for the QCD equation of state with 2+1 flavors. Phys. Lett. B 730, 99–104 (2014). 10.1016/j.physletb.2014.01.007. arXiv:1309.5258 [hep-lat]
    1. A. Bazavov, T. Bhattacharya, M. Cheng, C. DeTar, H.T. Ding et al., The chiral and deconfinement aspects of the QCD transition. Phys. Rev. D 85, 054503 (2012). 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.054503. arXiv:1111.1710 [hep-lat]
    1. M.C. Abreu et al., Evidence for deconfinement of quarks and gluons from the J / psi suppression pattern measured in Pb + Pb collisions at the CERN SPS. Phys. Lett. B 477, 28–36 (2000). 10.1016/S0370-2693(00)00237-9

LinkOut - more resources