Strategies to Reduce Fall Severity after a Perturbation during Ladder Climbing
- PMID: 39508262
- PMCID: PMC12056126
- DOI: 10.1080/24725838.2024.2420722
Strategies to Reduce Fall Severity after a Perturbation during Ladder Climbing
Abstract
OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONSFalls from ladders remain a significant cause of injuries in workplaces as well as residential settings. While recent research reveals factors related to fall severity from a ladder, strategies that workers can adopt to minimize fall severity are not well understood. Results from our current study indicated that increased upper limb strength, achieving a higher hand hold, and controlled reestablishment of the foot on the rung have summative benefits to reduce fall severity and increase recovery from a misstep perturbation. Ensuring adequate upper limb strength among workers, and training workers to climb ladders leading with hand placement during ascent and foot placement during descent, can facilitate these beneficial strategies to arrest a ladder fall.
Keywords: Ladder fall; biomechanics; foot slip; hand; perturbation; strength; upper limb.
Plain language summary
Background: Falls from ladders remain a significant cause of workplace injuries. Purpose: Collective biomechanical responses associated with minimizing fall severity were investigated. Methods: Secondary analysis. In a laboratory, a perturbation of a ladder rung (simulating a misstep) was applied during ladder climbing of healthy adults. Hand and foot placements after the perturbation were characterized by whether they would be anticipated to improve fall outcomes (based on a previous analysis). The number of beneficial fall recovery factors (i.e., high upper body strength, optimal hand placement, reestablished foot placement) on fall severity was assessed. Underlying temporal mechanisms of hand and foot placement response were further investigated. Results: Participants recovered from a perturbation better if they achieved a greater number of beneficial fall recovery factors (e.g., optimal hand placement and reestablished foot placement vs. either alone). The optimal hand placement was achieved when the hand moved prior to the climbing perturbation toward the next rung (2 rungs up) during ascent, and when the hand regrasped the original rung (did not move to the next rung) after the climbing perturbation during descent. These strategies were associated with faster hand-rung contact after the perturbation. Reestablished foot placement was more likely to occur when more time was allotted before foot-rung contact. Conclusions: Combining fall recovery strategies of a higher hand hold for higher upper limb strength and reestablishing the foot with control may be strategies to maximize recovery from a fall from a ladder.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Aldailami D, Banta JE, McCleary KJ, Mataya R, Ramadan MM, Chinnock R, & Suprono MS (2022). Predictors of fall-related injuries due to common consumer products among elderly adult emergency department visits in the United States during 2007–2017. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot, 29(2), 186–192. 10.1080/17457300.2021.1975769 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Barnett RL, & Poczynok PJ (2000). Ladder Rung vs. Siderail Hand Grip Strategies. Safety Brief, 16(4), 1–15.
-
- Blowsick DS, & Chaffin DB (1990). An ergonomic analysis of the ladder climbing activity. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 6(1), 17–27.
-
- Cabilan C, Vallmuur K, Eley R, Judge C, Cochrane S, Reed C, Riordan J, Roberts K, Thom O, & Wood G (2018). Impact of ladder‐related falls on the emergency department and recommendations for ladder safety. Emergency Medicine Australasia, 30(1), 95–102. - PubMed