Perceived Factors That Enable Resident Entry to the Specialty of Radiation Oncology
- PMID: 39509006
- DOI: 10.1007/s13187-024-02515-9
Perceived Factors That Enable Resident Entry to the Specialty of Radiation Oncology
Abstract
The field of radiation oncology (RO) has experienced large fluctuations in the number of applicants to residency programs. It is essential to understand the modifiable factors which influence entry. The objective of this project is to identify factors (i.e., "enablers") that motivate prospective medical students to apply to RO. A survey was developed to characterize RO enablers and barriers as perceived by current RO residents. An existing conceptual framework of why medical students choose primary care was used as the foundation of the survey and was modified for relevance towards RO. The final mixed-methods survey was administered to Canadian RO residents (2015-2019 match years) via Program Directors and the Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists resident member database. Medical students are most likely to select a career in RO during or after a clerkship experience. Extrinsic factors strongly motivating interest in RO were (% rating as very important or extremely important on a 5-point scale) as follows: positive feedback from radiation oncologists (86%) and RO residents (66%), clinical rotations in RO (84%) and mentorship (77%). Intrinsic factors include perceived fulfillment (95.2%), commitment to patient care (85.3%), and intellectual challenge (67.7%). Qualitative data highlighted the importance of mentorship, the "hand-heart" connection, career variability/flexibility, career satisfaction/lifestyle, and personal connections with cancer/cancer care in motivating students to pursue RO. Increased preclinical exposure such as mentorship may encourage students to seek clerkship opportunities in RO. These findings inform strategies to recruit medical students to a career in RO.
Keywords: Career selection; Radiation oncology; Recruitment; Residency.
© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to American Association for Cancer Education.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of Interest: Dr Giuliani is the Section Editor, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics. Dr Golden has received grant funding (outside of the submitted work) from the Radiation Oncology Institute and Radiological Society of North America. He is the Chair of the Radiation Oncology Education Collaborative Study Group. He is the Manager of RadOncQuestions LLC. Dr. Caissie has received grant funding (outside of the submitted work) from Nova Scotia Health (NSH) and VARIAN. She is a member of not-for-profit organizations including Canadian Partnership for Quality Radiotherapy (CPQR), Steering Committee Member; Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology (CARO) Quality and Standards (Q&S) Committee, Chair; American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Big Data Subcommittee, member; European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO)’s Comprehensive Quality Management in RT course, teaching faculty/Canadian representative; ESTRO Radiation Oncology Safety and Quality Committee (ROSQ): international liaison; Canadian Artificial intelligence and Data in RT Alliance (CADRA), co-founder/co-lead; Doctors NS AFP Department Head Committee, member. Dr Nguyen receives consultant fees and stock options (outside the submitted work) from NEED. Dr. Ingledew is the Chair of Royal College Physician and Surgeon Radiation Oncology Specialty Committee and Section Editor Education Red Journal.
References
-
- The Canadian Resident Matching Service (2016) R-1 Match Reports-2016: Choices and Match Results
-
- The Canadian Resident Matching Service (2017). R-1 Match Reports-2017: Choices and Match Results
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials