Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2025 Jan:202:110618.
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110618. Epub 2024 Nov 6.

Validation of an artificial intelligence-based prognostic biomarker in patients with oligometastatic Castration-Sensitive prostate cancer

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Validation of an artificial intelligence-based prognostic biomarker in patients with oligometastatic Castration-Sensitive prostate cancer

Jarey H Wang et al. Radiother Oncol. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

Background: There is a need for clinically actionable prognostic and predictive tools to guide the management of oligometastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (omCSPC).

Methods: This is a multicenter retrospective study to assess the prognostic and predictive performance of a multimodal artificial intelligence biomarker (MMAI; the ArteraAI Prostate Test) in men with omCSPC (n = 222). The cohort also included 51 patients from the STOMP and ORIOLE phase 2 clinical trials which randomized patients to observation versus metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). MMAI scores were computed from digitized histopathology slides and clinical variables. Overall survival (OS) and time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (TTCRPC) were assessed for the entire cohort from time of diagnosis. Metastasis free survival (MFS) was assessed for the trial cohort from time of randomization.

Results: In the overall cohort, patients with a high MMAI score had significantly worse OS (HR = 6.46, 95 % CI = 1.44-28.9; p = 0.01) and shorter TTCRPC (HR = 2.07, 95 % CI = 1.15-3.72; p = 0.015). In a multivariable Cox model, MMAI score remained the only variable significantly associated with OS (HR = 6.51, 95 % CI = 1.32-32.2; p = 0.02). In the subset of patients randomized in the STOMP and ORIOLE trials, high MMAI score corresponded to improved MFS with MDT (p = 0.039) compared to patients with a low score, with pinteraction = 0.04.

Conclusion: The ArteraAI MMAI biomarker is prognostic for OS and TTCRPC among patients with omCSPC and may predict for response to MDT. Further work is needed to validate the MMAI biomarker in a broader mCSPC cohort.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: PTT declares a consulting/advisory role and patent with Natsar Pharmaceuticals (Compounds and methods of use in ablative radiotherapy. Patent filed 3/9/2012. PCT/US2012/028475. PCT/WO/2012/122471) licensed with royalties to Natsar Pharmaceuticals. Consulting/advisory role and research funding with Reflexion Medical and Bayer Health. Consulting/advisory role with Regeneron, Dendreon, Noxopharm, Janssen, Myovant Sciences, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Lantheus. FYF is a consultant for Janssen, Astellas Pharma, Serimmune, Foundation Medicine, Exact Sciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Varian Medical Systems; advisor and stock options at Artera Inc; stock options for serving on the advisory boards from BlueStar Genomics and SerImmune. APK receives research funding from Advanced Accelerator Applications/Novartis (Inst), Merck (Inst), Bayer (Inst), Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd. PO reports a relationship with Janssen, Advanced Accelerator Applications, Curium, Bayer and MSD that includes: consulting or advisory. Piet Ost reports a relationship with Bayer and Varian that includes: funding grants. EC, TNS, TJR, TT, H-CH, SAH, RY, and AE are employed by Artera Inc. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2023;73(1):17–48. doi:10.3322/caac.21763 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Elmehrath AO, Afifi AM, Al-Husseini MJ, et al. Causes of Death Among Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer in the US From 2000 to 2016. JAMA Network Open. 2021;4(8):e2119568. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.19568 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herberts C, Wyatt AW, Nguyen PL, Cheng HH. Genetic and Genomic Testing for Prostate Cancer: Beyond DNA Repair. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2023;(43):e390384. doi:10.1200/EDBK_390384 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mateo J, McKay R, Abida W, et al. Accelerating precision medicine in metastatic prostate cancer. Nat Cancer. 2020;1(11):1041–1053. doi:10.1038/s43018-020-00141-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Phillips R, Shi WY, Deek M, et al. Outcomes of Observation vs Stereotactic Ablative Radiation for Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: The ORIOLE Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncology. 2020;6(5):650–659. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0147 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources