Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Nov 7;9(Suppl 4):e015599.
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015599.

Structures, processes and outcomes between first referral and referral hospitals in low-income and middle-income countries: a secondary preplanned analysis of the FALCON and ChEETAh randomised trials

Collaborators
Randomized Controlled Trial

Structures, processes and outcomes between first referral and referral hospitals in low-income and middle-income countries: a secondary preplanned analysis of the FALCON and ChEETAh randomised trials

NIHR Global Health Research Unit on Global Surgery et al. BMJ Glob Health. .

Abstract

First referral hospitals, often known as district hospitals, are neglected in the discourse on universal health coverage in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, these hospitals are important for delivering safe surgery for 313 million people. This study aims to understand the structures, processes and outcomes of patients undergoing surgery in these centres in LMICs. This is a preplanned secondary analysis using data from two high-quality randomised controlled trials undergoing major abdominal surgery across six LMICs. Type of hospital was the main explanatory variable, defined according to the WHO taxonomy as first referral (ie, district or rural) and referral (ie, secondary or tertiary). Of the included 15 657 patients across 80 hospitals from 6 countries, 3562 patients underwent surgery in first referral and 12 149 patients underwent surgery in referral centres. First referral centres have lower full-time surgeons (median: 1 vs 20, p<0.001) and medically trained anaesthetists (28.6% vs 87.1%, p<0.001) compared with referral centres. Patients undergoing surgery in first referral centres were more likely to have lower rates of American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) grades III-V (8.1% vs 22.7%, p<0.001), but higher rates of emergency procedures (65.1% vs 56.6%, p<0.001). In first referral centres, there was a significantly higher use of WHO surgical safety checklist (99.4% vs 93.3%, p<0.001) compared with referral centres. In adjusted analyses, there were no differences in 30-day mortality (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.62) and surgical site infection (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.90) between first referral and referral centres. Postoperative mortality and surgical site infection remain similar between first referral and referral centres in LMICs. There may be a clear need to upscale surgical volume safely in first referral centres to meet global surgical needs. High-quality research is needed to drive safe expansion of surgical workforce and strengthen referral pathways within these surgical health systems in LMICs.

Keywords: Surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow chart of patient inclusion into the study. FALCON (Reducing surgical site infections in low-income and middle-income countries); ChEETAh (Routine sterile glove and instrument change at the time of abdominal wound closure to prevent surgical site infection).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Structures and process measures for the FALCON and ChEETAh study on patients undergoing abdominal surgery.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Multivariable logistic regression on postoperative mortality between first referral and referral centres. ASA: American Society of Anestheisiology; GI, gastrointestinal.

References

    1. Meara JG, Greenberg SLM. The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery Global surgery 2030: Evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare and economic development. Surgery. 2015;157:834–5. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.02.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rastogi A, Agarwal A, Singh PK, et al. Distributing pulse oximeter: An initiative for improving patient safety and care. Indian J Anaesth. 2017;61:594. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_89_17. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Groen RS, Samai M, Stewart K-A, et al. Untreated surgical conditions in Sierra Leone: a cluster randomised, cross-sectional, countrywide survey. The Lancet. 2012;380:1082–7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61081-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weiser TG, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD, et al. An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data. Lancet. 2008;372:139–44. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60878-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shrime MG, Bickler SW, Alkire BC, et al. Global burden of surgical disease: an estimation from the provider perspective. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3:S8–9. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70384-5. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources