Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 7;23(1):139.
doi: 10.1186/s12937-024-01035-y.

Association between sulfur microbial diet and the risk of esophageal cancer: a prospective cohort study in 101,752 American adults

Affiliations

Association between sulfur microbial diet and the risk of esophageal cancer: a prospective cohort study in 101,752 American adults

Xiaorui Ren et al. Nutr J. .

Abstract

Background: Sulfur microbial diet (SMD) is a dietary pattern closely related to the intestinal load of sulfur-metabolizing microbes in humans. Diet and microbes may play an important role in the carcinogenesis of esophagus. However, epidemiological studies on SMD and esophageal cancer (EC) risk are scarce. Here, we evaluated this association based on a large American cohort.

Methods: In the cohort of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial, a SMD score was calculated to evaluate participants' compliance of SMD pattern, with higher scores presenting greater adherence. Cox hazards regression model was used to explore the association between the SMD score and the incidence of EC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA). Subgroup analyses were conducted to figure out potential modifiers interacting with SMD on EC. Sensitivity analyses were used to testify the robustness of our main result.

Results: Among 101,752 participants, 154 EC cases, consisted of 41 ESCC cases and 97 EA cases, were identified with mean follow-up of 8.9 years. In the fully adjusted model, the highest versus the lowest quartiles of the SMD score were found to be associated with an increased risk of EC and ESCC (EC: HRQ4 vs. Q1: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.05, 2.56; P = 0.016 for trend; ESCC: HRQ4 vs. Q1: 2.37; 95% CI: 1.02, 5.47; P = 0.031 for trend), while not significantly associated with increases risk of EA (HRQ4 vs. Q1: 1.41; P = 0.144 for trend). The main result remained through a series of sensitivity analyses. Subgroup analyses showed a stronger association between SMD and EC in participants with no regular consumption of aspirin (HRQ4 vs. Q1: 1.90; 95% CI: 1.04, 3.47) than in those using aspirin regularly (HRQ4 vs. Q1: 1.37; 95% CI: 0.71, 2.66) (P = 0.008 for interaction).

Conclusion: Adherence to the SMD pattern may be associated with increased risks of EC and ESCC, particularly for EC in individuals who do not regularly consume aspirin.

Keywords: Cox hazards regression analysis; Esophageal cancer; PLCO cancer screening trial; Sulfur microbial diet; Sulfur-metabolizing microbes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The flow chart of identifying eligible subjects. PLCO: Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian; BQ: Baseline Questionnaire; DHQ: Diet History Questionnaire
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The timeline and follow-up scheme of our study
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Dose-response analysis on the association of sulfur microbial diet score with the risk of esophageal cancer. Hazard ratio was adjusted for age (years), sex (male, female), race (white and non-white), marital status (married or living as married, other), smoking status (never, current, former), pack-years of smoking, educational level (college below, college graduate, post graduate), physical activity levels (min/week), body mass index (kg/m2), aspirin use (yes, no), pickled vegetables/fruit intake (g/day), history of diabetes (yes, no), history of hypertension (yes, no), and energy intake from diet (kcal/day)

Similar articles

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:7–30. - PubMed
    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49. - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:7–33. - PubMed
    1. Merkow RP, Bilimoria KY, Keswani RN, Chung J, Sherman KL, Knab LM, et al. Treatment trends, risk of lymph node metastasis, and outcomes for localized esophageal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106:dju133. - PubMed
    1. Steinmetz KA, Potter JD. Vegetables, fruit, and cancer. I. Epidemiology. Cancer Causes Control. 1991;2:325–57. - PubMed

Supplementary concepts

LinkOut - more resources