Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Jan 6;31(1):45-55.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-24-1612.

Randomized Phase II Study of Durvalumab with or without Tremelimumab in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Randomized Phase II Study of Durvalumab with or without Tremelimumab in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Eric Winquist et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: PD-L1 is overexpressed by dendritic cells in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) progressing on androgen receptor pathway inhibitors. We tested whether checkpoint blockade could enhance antitumor activity in mCRPC.

Patients and methods: In a multicenter open-label noncomparative randomized phase II study, patients with mCRPC treated with ≤1 prior cytotoxic chemotherapy, with measurable disease and progression on abiraterone and/or enzalutamide, were randomized to durvalumab 1,500 mg intravenously every 4 weeks ±4 doses of tremelimumab 75 mg intravenously. The primary endpoint was objective response (OR) by iRECIST using a Simon two-stage design. Correlative testing included PD-L1/cluster designation 8 IHC on baseline tumor biopsies and deep targeted sequencing of plasma cell-free DNA.

Results: Fifty-two patients were enrolled. Median age was 70 years (range, 50-83 years), and 52% had prior taxane therapy for mCRPC. In stage I, 13 patients were randomized to durvalumab with no OR observed. Durvalumab + tremelimumab advanced to stage II with 39 patients enrolled (receiving a median three cycles, range 1-53). Durvalumab + tremelimumab-related adverse events were mainly ≤ grade 2 but led to discontinuation in seven patients. There were seven ORs [19.4% (95% confidence interval: 8.2%-36.0%); intention to treat 17.9% (95% confidence interval: 7.5%-33.5%)]. Five responding tumors were PD-L1-positive and two exhibited DNA damage repair defects. Responses were observed without high tumor mutational burden or other genomic indices of immunotherapy sensitivity.

Conclusions: Durvalumab + tremelimumab is active in mCRPC, but patient selection remains a challenge. Further studies to develop predictive biomarkers are warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources