Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May;26(2):359-370.
doi: 10.1007/s10339-024-01240-x. Epub 2024 Nov 8.

Recalling more each time: context change effects in hypermnesia

Affiliations

Recalling more each time: context change effects in hypermnesia

Phillip N Goernert et al. Cogn Process. 2025 May.

Abstract

Hypermnesia, the increase in recall over trials without relearning or re-exposure to the studied items, has intrigued researchers since Ballard first reported the effect in 1913. In the typical hypermnesia study, additional retrieval trials are unexpected, and when announced, may induce context changes that re-focuses attention and effort on retrieving unrecalled items. The present studies examined the effects of context change on retrieval by telling some participants prior to study (trials-known condition) that three trials will be given to recall line drawings (Experiment 1) or words (Experiment 2) whereas others were not so informed (hypermnesia condition). Results of Experiment 1 revealed hypermnesia but no between-group differences on the sub-processes of item gains, losses, or intrusions. In Experiment 2, hypermnesia and between-group differences were found for item gains and intrusions, results that were marginally significant when data were aggregated across both experiments. Results are discussed in terms of the change in cue set hypothesis (Raaijmakers & Shiffrin, 1980) and the effects of internal and external context changes on hypermnesia. Suggestions for future studies are also presented.

Keywords: Context change; Hypermnesia; Memory; Recall; Repeated testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare they have no financial or nonfinancial conflicts of interest in conducting or in the publication of the submitted paper. The experiments reported here were approved by the Brandon University Ethics Committee (Ethics Certificate Number 23131).

References

    1. Anderson MC, Hanslmayr S (2014) Neural mechanisms of motivated forgetting. Trends Cogn Sci 18:279–292 - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Ballard PB (1913) Oblivescence and reminiscence. British J Psychol Monographs Suppl 1:1–84
    1. Bergstein J, Erdelyi M (2008) Recognition hypermnesia: how to get it. Memory 16:689–702 - PubMed - DOI
    1. Bjork RA (1975) Retrieval as a memory modifier: An interpretation of negative recency and related phenomena. Routledge, Information processing and cognition
    1. Bjork RA, Bjork EL (1992) A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. From learning processes to cognitive processes: essays in honor of William K. Estes 2:35–67

LinkOut - more resources