Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 1;45(10):e756-e762.
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004329.

The Relationship Between eSRTs and Upper Stimulation Levels in a Large Cohort of Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients

Affiliations

The Relationship Between eSRTs and Upper Stimulation Levels in a Large Cohort of Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients

Jourdan T Holder et al. Otol Neurotol. .

Abstract

Objective: To compare electrically evoked stapedial reflex thresholds (eSRTs) measured at 1 month post-activation to upper stimulation levels used for programming adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients over time in a large clinical population.

Study design: Review of prospectively collected clinical database.

Setting: Large CI program at an academic medical center.

Patients: Postlingually deafened adult CI recipients (n = 439).

Main outcome measures: eSRTs recorded in the medical record and upper stimulation levels derived from the programming software at 1 and 6 months post-activation.

Results: The correlation between eSRTs and upper stimulation levels was strong for all three manufacturers (r = 0.80-0.86). On average, upper stimulation levels were set 15.4 clinical levels below eSRT for Cochlear using a pulse width of 25 microseconds, 13.4 clinical levels below eSRT for Cochlear using a pulse width of 37 microseconds, 11.3 clinical units below eSRT for Advanced Bionics, and 0.1 charge unit above eSRT for MED-EL. eSRTs were found to be elicited at similar levels for different electrodes/frequencies across the array. After upper stimulation levels were set based on eSRT at 1 month post-activation, there was no significant change in upper stimulation levels between 1 and 6 months post-activation.

Conclusions: eSRTs and upper stimulation levels are highly correlated. Average differences between eSRTs and upper stimulation levels reported herein can be used to guide programming in the clinic. Further, when eSRTs are used to program upper stimulation levels, upper stimulation levels should be relatively similar across channels and stable over time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT(S) OF INTEREST TO DECLARE:

None directly related to this study

JTH: consultant Cochlear, advisory board for Advanced Bionics and MED-EL

RHG: advisory board for Cochlear, Advanced Bionics, and Frequency Therapeutics

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blamey P, Arndt P, Brimacombe J, et al. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol. Published online 1996. doi:10.1159/000259212 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blamey P, Artieres F, Başkent D, et al. Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: an update with 2251 patients. Audiol Neurootol. 2013;18(1):36–47. doi:10.1159/000343189 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lazard DS, Vincent C, Dé F, et al. Pre-, Per-and Postoperative Factors Affecting Performance of Postlinguistically Deaf Adults Using Cochlear Implants: A New Conceptual Model over Time. PLOS One. 2012;7(11):e48739. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048739 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schvartz-Leyzac KC, Conrad CA, Zwolan TA. Datalogging Statistics and Speech Recognition During the First Year of Use in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients. Otol Neurotol. 2019;40(7):e686–e693. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000002248 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holder JT, Dwyer N, Gifford RH. Duration of processor use per day is significantly correlated with speech recognition abilities in adults with cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol. 2019;41(2). doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000002477 - DOI - PMC - PubMed