Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 8;19(11):e0309319.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309319. eCollection 2024.

Systematic review of oral health in slums and non-slum urban settings of Low and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs): Disease prevalence, determinants, perception, and practices

Affiliations

Systematic review of oral health in slums and non-slum urban settings of Low and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs): Disease prevalence, determinants, perception, and practices

Mary E Osuh et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: A comprehensive summary of evidence about oral health in slum settings that could inform policy directions is lacking.

Objective: To summarise the latest evidence regarding oral disease burden and their determinants, perceptions, practices, and service utilization in the slums and non-slum urban settings of LMICs.

Design: Systematic review.

Data sources: Embase and MEDLINE (Ovid); PubMed; Scopus, Web of Science, CRD DARE Database; ELDIS; Essential Health Links; HINARI; African Index Medicus (AIM); and Bioline International, all searched from January 2000 to June 2023 using slum-related terms.

Eligibility criteria: Empirical studies of all designs were eligible. Studies published in English with full-text available and reporting disease burden, perceptions, behaviours and service utilisation related to oral health of residents of slums or broader settings including slums in low and middle-income countries were included.

Data extraction, quality assessment, synthesis and reporting: Studies were categorised and data were extracted and charted according to a preliminary conceptual framework refined by emerging findings. The Mixed Methods Assessment Tool (MMAT) was used to appraise the quality of empirical studies. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and (where applicable) the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guideline were adopted for guiding synthesis and reporting. Results were tabulated and narratively summarised.

Results: Full-text articles for 56 records were assessed for eligibility and 23 of the articles were included in this review. The majority (13 studies, 57%) were conducted in Asia, and nine studies (39%) in Africa. Six focused on slums (two examined slum and urban non-slum and four examined purely slum settings), two examined general urban settings, eight included both rural and urban areas in their settings, two examined disadvantaged/low socioeconomic, one assessed rural/urban/metropolis/municipal/district, three covered the national population or whole country, and one looked at high versus low socioeconomic regions. The commonest oral diseases reported were dental caries (prevalence: 13% - 76%), and periodontal diseases (prevalence: 23% - 99%). These were higher in slum settings and showed differences across age groups, gender, and socioeconomic classes. Most participants in the studies perceived their oral health status as satisfactory, a belief commoner among younger people, males, those in higher socio-economic classes, and employed. Mouth cleaning was mostly once daily, usually in the mornings. The use of toothpaste and brush was commonest. Other oral hygiene implements included toothpowder, chewing-stick, neem, charcoal, sand, snuff, salt, and the fingers. There was widespread engagement in home remedies for oral disease cure or prevention, while the use of professional dental care facilities was generally low and problem-driven.

Conclusion: The systematic review identified a sparse body of literature on oral health surveys in slums and other urban settings in LMICs. Available data suggest a high oral disease burden, worse in slums, use of inappropriate mouth cleaning tools, self-care practices for pain relief, and few visits to care facilities.

Systematic review registration: Systematic review registration with PROSPERO in February 2020, number CRD42020123613.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Summaries of studies retrieved and selected.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mulrow CD. Rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 1994;309:597–599. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6954.597 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Møller A, Myles P. What makes a good systematic review and meta-analysis? 2016. Oxford University Press. - PubMed
    1. Osuh ME. Prevalence and Determinants of Oral Diseases and Oral Health Care Needs in Slums: A comparative study with non-slum urban settings in Nigeria, in Division of Health Sciences, WMS. 2022. University of Warwick: United Kingdom.
    1. Osuh ME, Oke GA, Lilford RJ, Owoaje E, Harris B, Taiwo OJ, et al.. Prevalence and determinants of oral health conditions and treatment needs among slum and non-slum urban residents: Evidence from Nigeria. PLOS Global Public Health. 2022;2(4):e0000297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000297 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. UN-HABITAT. The Challenges of Slums. UN-HABITAT’s new Global Report on Human Settlements. 2003.

Publication types