Longitudinal Assessment of Transfusion Intensity in Patients With JAK Inhibitor-Naive or -Experienced Myelofibrosis Treated With Momelotinib
- PMID: 39516087
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2024.10.001
Longitudinal Assessment of Transfusion Intensity in Patients With JAK Inhibitor-Naive or -Experienced Myelofibrosis Treated With Momelotinib
Abstract
Purpose: Anemia is a cardinal feature of myelofibrosis often managed with red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, which may contribute to negative prognostic, quality-of-life, and healthcare-related economic impacts. The Janus kinase (JAK) 1/JAK2/activin A receptor type 1 inhibitor momelotinib was approved for the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis and anemia based on clinical trial evidence of anemia, spleen, and symptom benefits illustrated using binomial response/nonresponse endpoints. In the present post hoc, descriptive analyses, the impact of momelotinib on RBC transfusion burden over time was further characterized across JAK inhibitor-naive and -experienced patients.
Methods: All RBC units transfused were collected during the baseline and 24-week treatment periods, initially in a single-arm phase 2 study as proof-of-concept analysis, and then versus comparators (ruxolitinib, best available therapy [BAT], and danazol) in the phase 3 SIMPLIFY-1, SIMPLIFY-2, and MOMENTUM studies, respectively.
Results: In the phase 2 study, mean transfusion requirement changed by -1.5 units/28 days, with 85% of patients (35/41) achieving numeric transfusion reduction. Across SIMPLIFY-1, SIMPLIFY-2, and MOMENTUM, mean transfusion requirements decreased with momelotinib (-0.1, -0.36, and -0.86 units/28 days), while mean requirements with ruxolitinib, BAT, and danazol changed by +0.39, 0, and ‒0.28 units/28 days, respectively. Overall, 87% (185/213), 77% (79/103), and 85% (110/130) of patients had improved or stable transfusion intensities with momelotinib versus 54% (117/216), 62% (32/52), and 63% (41/65) with ruxolitinib, BAT, and danazol.
Conclusion: These novel time-dependent transfusion burden analyses demonstrate that momelotinib is associated with anemia-related benefits in most patients and greater transfusion burden reduction versus comparators.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02515630, NCT01969838, NCT02101268, NCT04173494.
Keywords: Anemia; Hemoglobin; Janus kinase inhibitor; Myeloproliferative neoplasm; Red blood cell transfusion.
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure CNH has received institutional research funding from BMS/Celgene, Constellation Pharmaceuticals Inc (a MorphoSys Company), and Novartis; consulting fees from AOP, Galecto, GSK, Keros, SOBI, and Roche; advisory role and speaker funding from AbbVie, AOP Pharma, BMS/Celgene, Constellation Pharmaceuticals Inc (a MorphoSys Company), CTI BioPharma, Galecto, Geron, GSK, Jannsen, Novartis, Roche, and Promedior; and support from Novartis for attending meetings. RM reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Blueprint, BMS, CTI Biopharma, Genentech, Geron, GSK, Incyte, MorphoSys, Novartis, and Sierra Oncology. MT reports research funding from BMS and advisory board participation for BMS, Kyowa Kirin, and SDP/Sumitomo. VG reports consulting fees from AbbVie, BMS Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, GSK, and Pfizer and participation in a data safety monitoring/advisory board for AbbVie, BMS Celgene, and Daiichi Sankyo. ATG reports consulting fees from AbbVie, BMS, Constellation/MorphoSys, CTI Biopharma, Imago Biosciences/Merck, Incyte, PharmaEssentia, Sierra Oncology, and Telios. AP reports payment of honoraria from and participation in advisory board work with AbbVie, CTI BioPharma, GSK, Incyte, Kartos, and Novartis. YTG reports consulting fees from Amgen, Antengene, Astellas, AstraZeneca, GSK, Janssen, Pfizer, and Roche; and payment or honoraria from AbbVie, DKSH, and Recordati. MLF reports consulting fees from AbbVie, GSK, Novartis, Sanofi, and Sierra Oncology and participation in a Keros Therapeutics steering committee. DM reports grants from Imago Biosciences; payment or honoraria from AbbVie, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis; participation in a data safety monitoring board for the UK ALL RIC trial; and a leadership role with the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. JP reports payment or honoraria from CTI Biopharma and participation in a data safety monitoring/advisory board for MorphoSys. LF reports honoraria from GSK and Novartis and advisory board participation with GSK, Medison, and Novartis. AV reports payment or honoraria from AbbVie, AOP, BMS, GSK, Incyte, Novartis, and Roche. SK reports research funding, consulting fees, honoraria, and/or travel grants from AbbVie, AOP Pharma, BMS/Celgene, CTI Biopharma, Geron, GSK, Incyte, Imago Biosciences, iOMEDICO, Janssen, Kartos, MPN Hub, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaEssentia, and Sierra Oncology and intellectual property with RWTH Aachen University. FP reports grants from BMS; consulting fees from AbbVie, AOP Health, BMS/Celgene, Karo Pharma, Kyowa Kirin, MEI, Novartis, Roche, Sierra Oncology, and Sumitomo; and payment or honoraria from AbbVie, AOP Health, BMS/Celgene, Novartis, and Roche. STO reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Constellation, BMS, Cogent, CTI Biopharma, Geron, Incyte, Protagonist, and Sierra Oncology. CE, BS, and FJGC report employment with and stock/stock options at GSK. SEL declares no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Momelotinib versus Continued Ruxolitinib or Best Available Therapy in JAK Inhibitor-Experienced Patients with Myelofibrosis and Anemia: Subgroup Analysis of SIMPLIFY-2.Adv Ther. 2024 Sep;41(9):3722-3735. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02928-4. Epub 2024 Jul 11. Adv Ther. 2024. PMID: 38990433 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Indirect treatment comparisons of momelotinib vs pacritinib safety and anemia outcomes in patients with myelofibrosis.Future Oncol. 2025 Jul;21(16):2067-2075. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2025.2511562. Epub 2025 Jun 6. Future Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40476686 Free PMC article.
-
Indirect treatment comparison of momelotinib vs fedratinib safety in patients with myelofibrosis.Future Oncol. 2025 Jul;21(16):2077-2087. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2025.2511564. Epub 2025 Jun 6. Future Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40476514 Free PMC article.
-
Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 21;12(12):CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34932836 Free PMC article.
-
Momelotinib: an emerging treatment for myelofibrosis patients with anemia.J Hematol Oncol. 2022 Jan 19;15(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01157-4. J Hematol Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35045875 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of the Effect of Momelotinib on Cardiac Repolarization: A Thorough QT Study.Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2025 Apr;14(4):333-342. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.1509. Epub 2025 Jan 23. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2025. PMID: 39844679 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Emerging Therapeutic Approaches for Anemia in Myelofibrosis.Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2025 May 3;20(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s11899-025-00751-4. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2025. PMID: 40317385 Review.
-
Anemia in Myelofibrosis: A Focus on Proactive Management and the Role of Momelotinib.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 4;16(23):4064. doi: 10.3390/cancers16234064. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39682250 Free PMC article. Review.
-
How I individualize selection of JAK inhibitors for patients with myelofibrosis.Blood. 2025 Apr 17;145(16):1724-1737. doi: 10.1182/blood.2023022415. Blood. 2025. PMID: 39357058
-
Impact of calreticulin mutations on treatment and survival outcomes in myelofibrosis during ruxolitinib therapy.Ann Hematol. 2025 Jan;104(1):241-251. doi: 10.1007/s00277-025-06204-5. Epub 2025 Jan 20. Ann Hematol. 2025. PMID: 39831987 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous