Effect of Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy on Return to Intended Oncologic Therapy for Gastric Cancer
- PMID: 39516415
- PMCID: PMC11663121
- DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16440-0
Effect of Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy on Return to Intended Oncologic Therapy for Gastric Cancer
Abstract
Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy offers survival benefit to patients with gastric cancer. Only 50-65% of patients who undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy and gastrectomy are able to receive adjuvant therapy. It is optimal to start adjuvant therapy within 8 weeks after gastrectomy. We compared the rate of return to intended oncologic therapy (RIOT) between minimally invasive gastrectomy (MIG) and open gastrectomy (OG).
Method: Retrospectively, we analyzed patients who underwent gastrectomy within a multi-hospital university-based health system (2019-2022). Data on patient demographics, comorbid conditions, operative approach, and postoperative outcomes were assessed with univariate analysis and multivariable analysis (MVA) to determine the association with RIOT.
Results: Among 87 eligible patients, 33 underwent MIG and 54 underwent OG. There were no differences in demographics, performance status, comorbid conditions, or type of gastrectomy between the two groups. MIG patients were significantly more likely to RIOT compared with OG patients (87.9% vs. 63%, p = 0.003), with 73.1% of MIG patients starting adjuvant therapy within 8 weeks compared with 53.1% of OG patients. Factors associated with higher odds of RIOT included MIG and age <65 years, while major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIa) was associated with lower odds of RIOT. On MVA, MIG was independently associated with higher odds of RIOT compared with OG (odds ratio 6.05, 95% confidence interval 1.47-24.78, p = 0.008).
Conclusion: The minimally invasive approach may benefit patients undergoing gastrectomy, irrespective of the extent of gastric resection for adenocarcinoma. MIG is associated with a higher likelihood of (1) RIOT and (2) starting adjuvant therapy within the optimal time period after gastrectomy.
© 2024. Society of Surgical Oncology.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosures: Mihir M. Shah is a Proctor with Intuitive Inc., for robotic surgery. Andee Koo, Parit T. Mavani, Caitlin Sok, Subir Goyal, Seth Concors, Meredith C. Mason, Joshua H. Winer, Maria C. Russell, Kenneth Cardona, Edward Lin, Shishir K. Maithel, David A. Kooby, and Charles A. Staley III have no conflicts of interest to declare that may be relevant to the contents of this study.
Similar articles
-
Minimally invasive gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in the United States: Utilization and short-term oncologic outcomes.J Surg Oncol. 2015 Nov;112(6):616-21. doi: 10.1002/jso.24052. Epub 2015 Sep 23. J Surg Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26394810
-
Safety and feasibility of minimally invasive gastrectomy during the early introduction in the Netherlands: short-term oncological outcomes comparable to open gastrectomy.Gastric Cancer. 2017 Sep;20(5):853-860. doi: 10.1007/s10120-017-0695-8. Epub 2017 Feb 9. Gastric Cancer. 2017. PMID: 28185027 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of minimally invasive gastrectomy on use of and time to adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric adenocarcinoma.J Surg Oncol. 2020 Mar;121(3):486-493. doi: 10.1002/jso.25834. Epub 2020 Jan 9. J Surg Oncol. 2020. PMID: 31919862 Free PMC article.
-
The safety and efficacy of gastrectomy for gastric cancer among octogenarians: a western population-based study.J Geriatr Oncol. 2019 Jul;10(4):598-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Oct 24. J Geriatr Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30366851
-
Impact of Minimally Invasive Approach on Attainment of a Textbook Oncologic Outcome Following Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Review of the National Cancer Database.Am Surg. 2024 Apr;90(4):819-828. doi: 10.1177/00031348231212587. Epub 2023 Nov 6. Am Surg. 2024. PMID: 37931215 Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of perioperative fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel delivery on postoperative survival in locally advanced oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma.Gastric Cancer. 2025 Sep;28(5):968-981. doi: 10.1007/s10120-025-01643-5. Epub 2025 Jul 14. Gastric Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40658311 Free PMC article.
-
ASO Author Reflections: Enhancing Return to Intended Oncologic Therapy in Gastric Cancer-The Role of Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy.Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;32(2):1257-1258. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16517-w. Epub 2024 Nov 18. Ann Surg Oncol. 2025. PMID: 39556175 No abstract available.
-
Decreasing Complications After Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy: Is a Totally Minimally Invasive Approach the Solution?J Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug;132(2):308-316. doi: 10.1002/jso.70011. Epub 2025 Jun 18. J Surg Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40530950
References
-
- Bang Y-J, Kim Y-W, Yang H-K, et al. Adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): a phase 3 open-label, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2012;379(9813):315–321. - PubMed
-
- Macdonald JS, Smalley SR, Benedetti J, et al. Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. New England Journal of Medicine. 2001;345(10):725–730. - PubMed
-
- Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. New England Journal of Medicine. 2007;357(18):1810–1820. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous