Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Oct 23;24(21):6815.
doi: 10.3390/s24216815.

Resting-State Electroencephalogram Depression Diagnosis Based on Traditional Machine Learning and Deep Learning: A Comparative Analysis

Affiliations
Review

Resting-State Electroencephalogram Depression Diagnosis Based on Traditional Machine Learning and Deep Learning: A Comparative Analysis

Haijun Lin et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

The global prevalence of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is increasing at an alarming rate, underscoring the urgent need for timely and accurate diagnoses to facilitate effective interventions and treatments. Electroencephalography remains a widely used neuroimaging technique in psychiatry, due to its non-invasive nature and cost-effectiveness. With the rise of computational psychiatry, the integration of EEG with artificial intelligence has yielded remarkable results in diagnosing depression. This review offers a comparative analysis of two predominant methodologies in research: traditional machine learning and deep learning methods. Furthermore, this review addresses key challenges in current research and suggests potential solutions. These insights aim to enhance diagnostic accuracy for depression and also foster further development in the area of computational psychiatry.

Keywords: artificial intelligence; deep learning; major depressive disorder; resting-state electroencephalography; traditional machine learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
General framework for depression diagnosis based on TML and DL methods.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The 10–20 system electrode position diagram, taken from Ref. [68].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Schematic diagram of brain regions.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Frequency of different preprocessing methods used in studies of depression diagnosis.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Frequency distribution of TML-based algorithms for depression diagnosis.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Frequency distribution of deep learning-based algorithms for depression diagnosis.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Frequency distribution of different validation methods in depression diagnostic studies.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lang U.E., Borgwardt S. Molecular mechanisms of depression: Perspectives on new treatment strategies. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2013;31:761–777. doi: 10.1159/000350094. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Woody C.A., Ferrari A.J., Siskind D.J., Whiteford H.A., Harris M.G. A systematic review and meta-regression of the prevalence and incidence of perinatal depression. J. Affect. Disord. 2017;219:86–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.05.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization . Depression and Other Common Mental Disorders: Global Health Estimates. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2017.
    1. Bueno-Notivol J., Gracia-Garcia P., Olaya B., Lasheras I., Lopez-Anton R., Santabarbara J. Prevalence of depression during the COVID-19 outbreak: A meta-analysis of community-based studies. Int. J. Clin. Health Psychol. 2021;21:100196. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2020.07.007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Keynejad R., Spagnolo J., Thornicroft G. WHO mental health gap action programme (mhGAP) intervention guide: Updated systematic review on evidence and impact. BMJ Ment. Health. 2021;24:124–130. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2021-300254. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources