Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 29;16(21):3645.
doi: 10.3390/cancers16213645.

The Effect of a Tailored Educational Flyer on Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Rural Residents: Lessons Learned from a Pilot Randomized Trial

Affiliations

The Effect of a Tailored Educational Flyer on Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Rural Residents: Lessons Learned from a Pilot Randomized Trial

Jungyoon Kim et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Stool-based tests, such as the fecal immunochemical test (FIT), have been widely used for increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Small media, such as printed materials or flyers, are known to be an effective intervention to increase CRC screening by fecal tests. However, more evidence is needed to determine whether such small media are effective in improving screening uptake of a mailed FIT intervention targeted at rural populations in the USA. Methods: In this randomized study, 1230 FIT kits were mailed from July to December 2022 to rural Nebraskans aged 45-74 who were not up to date on CRC screening. Half of the participants (n = 608) also received a tailored, one-page, gender-specific educational flyer created based on focus groups with rural residents. Logistic regression was used to determine predictors of returning the FIT. Results: Study participants were predominantly female (76%), non-Hispanic White (83%), and within the age group of 55-64 (43%). Overall, 192 (15.6%) kits were returned (16.1% from the flyer group; 15.1% from the no-flyer group). However, we found no significant differences between the flyer and no-flyer groups (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR]: 1.21; 95% CI: 0.88-1.66). Females (AOR: 1.78; 95% CI: 1.19-6.14) and the oldest (65-74) age group (AOR: 5.03; 95% CI: 2.78-8.47) were more likely to return FIT kits than males and the youngest (45-54) age group. Conclusions: A tailored educational flyer was not effective in improving the CRC-screening-rate-by-mailed-FIT approach for rural populations. Future research should explore the content, timing, and mode of delivery of educational interventions as well as other multi-component strategies to improve screening rates. Public health officials might also consider developing strategies targeted at males and younger (45-54) age groups.

Keywords: FIT; colorectal cancer; education; intervention; rural; screening; small media.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Educational flyers tailored toward rural residents: (a) a flyer image for female participants; (b) a flyer image for male participants.

References

    1. American Cancer Society . Cancer Facts & Figures. American Cancer Society; Atlanta, GA, USA: 2023.
    1. National Cancer Institute . State Cancer Profiles: Nebraska. National Cancer Institute; Bethesda, MD, USA: 2022.
    1. Andrilla C.H.A., Moore T.E., Man Wong K., Evans D.V. Investigating the Impact of Geographic Location on Colorectal Cancer Stage at Diagnosis: A National Study of the SEER Cancer Registry. J. Rural Health. 2020;36:316–325. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12392. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zahnd W.E., James A.S., Jenkins W.D., Izadi S.R., Fogleman A.J., Steward D.E., Colditz G.A., Brard L. Rural-Urban Differences in Cancer Incidence and Trends in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2018;27:1265–1274. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0430. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lin J.S., Perdue L.A., Henrikson N.B., Bean S.I., Blasi P.R. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2021;325:1978–1998. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.4417. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources