Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 29;13(21):6473.
doi: 10.3390/jcm13216473.

Comparative Experimental Evaluation of Orthodontic Appliances for Maxillary Arch Expansion

Affiliations

Comparative Experimental Evaluation of Orthodontic Appliances for Maxillary Arch Expansion

Ghazal Ebrahimy et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The orthodontic treatment of posterior crossbite using appliances for gradual maxillary expansion is crucial to ensure proper transversal jaw relationships as much as occlusal functionality. The aim of this study was to analyze forces and torques generated by different appliances for maxillary expansion. Methods: Measurements were conducted for the Wilson® 3D® Quadhelix (WQH) and Wilson® 3D® Multi-Action Palatal Appliance (WPA) across various sizes and compared to the Remanium® Quadhelix (RQH). Activations were set to 8 mm for the WQH and RQH and 6 and 8 mm for the WPA. Rotations and root torque were simulated via an activation of 10° for arches. A total of eight test series were conducted. Results: The WPA displayed the highest force and torque values for all movements, far surpassing recommended guideline values (expansion 8.5->15.0 N/46.3-86.5 Nmm, rotation 3.1-6.1 N/40.7-61.4 Nmm, torque 3.9-5.1 N/22.4-29.7 Nmm), and the WQH displayed the lowest values (expansion 2.7-12.6 N/11.1-39.6 Nmm, rotation 0.1-1.7 N/23.0-32.2 Nmm, torque 0.9-2.9 N/3.4-10.5 Nmm). Appliances with the smallest transverse dimensions exhibited the highest force and torque maxima. Conclusions: This study underscores the importance of understanding biomechanical principles in orthodontics for minimizing unintended tooth movements, providing detailed insights into the force systems of appliances acting in the transverse plane, and establishing a foundation for future clinical investigations to validate these in vitro findings.

Keywords: arch expansion; orthodontic forces; posterior crossbite; quadhelix; torque.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The three appliances investigated for the resulting forces and torques induced by experimental expansion, rotation, and root torque. Wilson® 3D® Quadhelix (left, (A)), Wilson® 3D® Multi-Action Palatal Appliance (middle, (B)), Remanium® Quadhelix (right, (C)). A Rocky Mountain Orthodontics® (RMO) lock, pre-welded for vertical insertion, used for the molar bands of the Wilson® 3D® appliances (left, (D)). An Orthorama® (Dentaurum) lock bonded directly to the Frasaco teeth for the horizontal insertion of the Remanium® Quadhelix (right, (E)).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The forces measured in Newtons (N) (A) and torques measured in Newton-millimeters (Nmm) (B) exerted by the Wilson® 3D® Multi-Action Palatal Appliance (WPA) during expansion activation recorded by the OMSS are presented in columns corresponding to each appliance size, ranging from 32 mm to 56 mm. Forces exceeding 15 N, which surpassed the measurement capacity of the OMSS’s sensors, are highlighted in red. Exemplified force and torque components during an expansion movement with a WPA size of 32 mm (C). A total of n = 5 specimens per appliance variant and size were analyzed.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The forces measured in Newtons (N) (A) and torques measured in Newton-millimeters (Nmm) (B) exerted by the Wilson® 3D® Multi-Action Palatal Appliance (WPA) during expansion activation recorded by the OMSS are presented in columns corresponding to each appliance size, ranging from 32 mm to 56 mm. Forces exceeding 15 N, which surpassed the measurement capacity of the OMSS’s sensors, are highlighted in red. Exemplified force and torque components during an expansion movement with a WPA size of 32 mm (C). A total of n = 5 specimens per appliance variant and size were analyzed.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forces measured in Newtons (N) (A) and torques measured in Newton-millimeters (Nmm) (B) exerted by the Wilson® 3D® Quadhelix (WQH) across sizes ranging from 25 to 40 mm and for the Remanium® Quadhelix (RQH) across sizes ranging from 36 to 40 mm. A total of n = 5 specimens per appliance variant and size were analyzed.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forces measured in Newtons (N) (A) and torques measured in Newton-millimeters (Nmm) (B) exerted by the Wilson® 3D® Quadhelix (WQH) across sizes ranging from 25 to 40 mm and for the Remanium® Quadhelix (RQH) across sizes ranging from 36 to 40 mm. A total of n = 5 specimens per appliance variant and size were analyzed.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bell R.A., Kiebach T.J. Posterior crossbites in children: Developmental-based diagnosis and implications to normative growth patterns. Semin. Orthod. 2014;20:77–113. doi: 10.1053/j.sodo.2014.04.002. - DOI
    1. Macena M.C., Katz C.R., Rosenblatt A. Prevalence of a posterior crossbite and sucking habits in Brazilian children aged 18–59 months. Eur. J. Orthod. 2009;31:357–361. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn128. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Malandris M., Mahoney E.K. Aetiology, diagnosis and treatment of posterior cross-bites in the primary dentition. Int. J. Paediatr. Dent. 2004;14:155–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2004.00546.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Almaqrami B.S., Alhammadi M.S., Tang B., ALyafrusee E.S., Hua F., He H. Three-dimensional morphological and positional analysis of the temporomandibular joint in adults with posterior crossbite: A cross-sectional comparative study. J. Oral. Rehabil. 2021;48:666–677. doi: 10.1111/joor.13156. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Myllymäki E., Heikinheimo K., Suominen A., Evälahti M., Michelotti A., Svedström-Oristo A.L., Rice D.P. Longitudinal trends in temporomandibular joint disorder symptoms, the impact of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment: A 20-year prospective study. J. Oral. Rehabil. 2023;50:739–745. doi: 10.1111/joor.13471. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources