A Nation-Wide Evaluation of Suboptimal Lipid-Lowering Treatment Patterns Among Patients Undergoing Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome in Hungary
- PMID: 39518701
- PMCID: PMC11547159
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm13216562
A Nation-Wide Evaluation of Suboptimal Lipid-Lowering Treatment Patterns Among Patients Undergoing Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome in Hungary
Abstract
Background/Objectives: A significant gap exists between guideline recommendations and everyday practice. Stringent treatment is needed for vulnerable patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: Data on the lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), including the adherence, persistence, and mortality of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass surgery in Hungary in 2018 were followed up and analyzed based on the National Health Insurance Fund database until the end of 2020. Results: A total of 12,997 patients underwent revascularization for ACS in 2018, whose discharge therapy included any LLT, a high- or moderate-intensity statin, or ezetimibe at a proportion of 91%, 75%, 12%, and 4%, respectively. By the end of the observation period, the frequency of ezetimibe administration increased to 11%. Persistence decreased, reaching 50% for all therapeutic regimens by month 16. Patients on moderate statin doses had a significantly higher mortality rate at the end of follow-up than those receiving high-intensity statin with (20% vs. 9%, p < 0.0001) or without (20% vs. 14%, p = 0.00029) ezetimibe. Those taking less potent statin doses had higher rates of comorbidities; for example, a minimum of three comorbidities were present in 39% of patients taking medium statin doses and 23% among those on high-intensity statin therapy (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: LLT persistence decreased during follow-up. The administration of a higher-intensity lipid-lowering regimen was associated with better persistence and adherence, along with more favorable mortality rates. Multimorbidity was associated with the use of lower statin doses. The results suggest that more attention is needed in terms of lipid control of females, elderly people, and individuals with several comorbidities, and emphasis should be placed on improving persistence and increasing the frequency of combined LLT prescriptions.
Keywords: acute coronary syndrome; adherence; ezetimibe; lipid-lowering therapy; persistence; statins.
Conflict of interest statement
G.G.N.: lecture fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer, Novartis, and NovoNordisk. L.M.: lectures fees from Hungarian branches of EGIS, Richter Gedeon, KRKA, Novartis, Sandoz. A.G. and N.K.: working at Novartis Hungary Ltd., Budapest. I.R.: lectures fees from Hungarian branches of EGIS, KRKA, Mylan, Richter Gedeon. G.R. and I.F. are employed by RxTarget Ltd. Their contribution to this study analysis was financially compensated by Novartis Hungary Lt. Z.C.: lecture fees from Hungarian branches of EGIS, Richter Gedeon, KRKA, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, MSD Pharma, Medtronic. I.K.: lecture fees from Hungarian branches of EGIS, Sanofi, Novartis. D.A.: lecture fees from Amgen, Bayer AG, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Krka, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, MSD Pharma, Richter, Teva. L.B.: lectures fees and/or travel grants from Hungarian branches of Richter. Gedeon, KRKA, Novartis, Sandoz, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Bausch Health. G.P.: lectures fees from Hungarian branches of Novartis, Richter Gedeon, and Sandoz.
Figures




References
-
- Mach F., Baigent C., Catapano A.L., Koskinas K.C., Casula M., Badimon L., Chapman M.J., De Backer G.G., Delgado V., Ference B.A., et al. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: Lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur. Heart J. 2020;41:111–188. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455. - DOI - PubMed
-
- The Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration. Mihaylova B., Emberson J., Blackwell L., Keech A., Simes J., Barnes E.H., Voysey M., Gray A., Collins R., et al. The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: Meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials. Lancet. 2012;380:581–590. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60367-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Krychtiuk K.A., Ahrens I., Drexel H., Halvorsen S., Hassager C., Huber K., Kurpas D., Niessner A., Schiele F., Semb A.G., et al. Acute LDL-C reduction post ACS: Strike early and strike strong: From evidence to clinical practice. A clinical consensus statement of the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC), in collaboration with the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC) and the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy. Eur. Heart J. Acute Cardiovasc. Care. 2022;11:939–949. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuac123. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Writing Committee. Lloyd-Jones D.M., Morris P.B., Ballantyne C.M., Birtcher K.K., Covington A.M., De Palma S.M., Minissian M.B., Orringer C.E., Smith S.C., Jr., et al. 2022 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on the Role of Nonstatin Therapies for LDL-Cholesterol Lowering in the Management of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2022;80:1366–1418. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.07.006. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous