Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct 27;16(21):3654.
doi: 10.3390/nu16213654.

Cytoprotective Effects of Antioxidant Peptides from Red Californian Worm (Eisenia foetida) Hydrolysate on Differentiated Caco-2 Cells

Affiliations

Cytoprotective Effects of Antioxidant Peptides from Red Californian Worm (Eisenia foetida) Hydrolysate on Differentiated Caco-2 Cells

Yhoan S Gaviria et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Background/objectives: When prooxidants outweigh antioxidants, oxidative stress can occur, causing an accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). This process can lead to cellular damage and plays a role in the development of numerous health conditions. This study aimed to investigate the cytoprotective effects on differentiated Caco-2 cells of hydrolysates derived from the red Californian worm (WH) and their fractions, identify the peptides responsible for this effect, and elucidate the mechanisms involved.

Methods: The WH was obtained through hydrolysis with Alcalase 2.4 L and subsequently fractionated to two fractions (F > 3 kDa and F < 3 kDa) using a ceramic membrane with a molecular weight cutoff of 3 kDa. The peptides found in the F < 3 kDa fraction, demonstrating the highest cytoprotective activity, were then sequenced via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis (LC-MS/MS), and molecular docking was conducted to elucidate the underlying antioxidant mechanisms.

Results: The hydrolysate of Eisenia foetida and its F < 3 kDa fraction exhibited no cytotoxicity, protected the cells from H2O2-induced oxidative stress (50% increase viability), preserved cell viability by restoring their redox status (ROS: 20% decrease, and glutathione (GSH): recovered to basal control levels) and cell cycle distribution, and decreased apoptosis (16%). Twenty-eight peptides were identified, with five showing antioxidant activity through stable interactions with myeloperoxidase (MPO) and Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap-1), KPEDWDDR being the peptide that presented the highest affinity with both molecules (-7.9 and -8.8 kCal/mol, respectively).

Conclusions: These results highlight the WH as a potential source of bioactive peptides for the management of oxidative stress.

Keywords: antioxidant peptide; cytoprotective effect; molecular docking; oxidative stress; red Californian worm (Eisenia foetida).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cytoprotective activity of WH and its fractions (F) on differentiated Caco-2 cells. Results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, derived from four independent experiments (n = 5). Significant differences (p < 0.05) are denoted by different letters (a–f).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Evaluation of the cytoprotective effect of worm hydrolysate (WH) and its fractions (F) on differentiated Caco-2 cells: (a) intracellular ROS; (b) intracellular glutathione (GSH); (c) intracellular calcium. Results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation of four independent experiments (n = 5). Significant differences (p < 0.05) are denoted by different letters (a–e). AU: Arbitrary units.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cell cycle distribution of differentiated Caco-2 cells treated with worm hydrolysate (WH) and its fractions (F). Results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, derived from four independent experiments (n = 5). Different letters (a–d) for the treatments in the same cell cycle phase indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effect of incubation with WH and its fractions (F) in differentiated Caco-2 cells. Results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation from four independent experiments (n = 5). Significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments within the same cell state are denoted by different letters (a–e).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Molecular interaction of the KPEDWDDR peptide-Keap1: (a) molecule in quaternary representation; (b) surface hydrophobicity diagram; (c) charge interactions (pink color: Keap1 molecule; green color: KPEDWDDR peptide); (d) 2D interaction diagram.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Molecular interaction of the KPEDWDDR peptide-MPO: (a) molecule in quaternary representation; (b) surface hydrophobicity diagram; (c) charge interactions (white color: MPO molecule; red color: KPEDWDDR peptide; green color: hydrogen bonds); (d) 2D interaction diagram.

Similar articles

References

    1. Carocho M., Ferreira I.C.F.R. A Review on Antioxidants, Prooxidants and Related Controversy: Natural and Synthetic Compounds, Screening and Analysis Methodologies and Future Perspectives. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013;51:15–25. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2012.09.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gómez L.J., Gómez N.A., Zapata J.E., López-García G., Cilla A., Alegría A. In-Vitro Antioxidant Capacity and Cytoprotective/Cytotoxic Effects upon Caco-2 Cells of Red Tilapia (Oreochromis spp.) Viscera Hydrolysates. Food Res. Int. 2019;120:52–61. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.02.029. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Onel L., Morales H.G., Nayade D., Roche P., Rosa D., Flores Sánchez M. Enzimas generadoras de especies reactivas del oxígeno: Mieloperoxidasa. Rev. Cuba. Investig. Biomed. 1998;17:190–197.
    1. He C., Tamimi R.M., Hankinson S.E., Hunter D.J., Han J. A Prospective Study of Genetic Polymorphism in MPO, Antioxidant Status, and Breast Cancer Risk. Breast. Cancer Res. Treat. 2009;113:585–594. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-9962-z. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lu M.C., Jiao Q., Liu T., Tan S.J., Zhou H.S., You Q.D., Jiang Z.Y. Discovery of a Head-to-Tail Cyclic Peptide as the Keap1-Nrf2 Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitor with High Cell Potency. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018;143:1578–1589. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.10.052. - DOI - PubMed