Tricuspid Anterior and Posterior Patch (TRAPP) Repair of Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation

Abstract

Objective: Annuloplasty is the most common strategy for repair of functional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) but is not effective in patients with massive/torrential FTR or leaflet tethering. To address the deficits of tricuspid annuloplasty, TRicuspid Anterior and Posterior Patch (TRAPP) repair was developed, which is a pericardial patch augmentation of the anterior and posterior leaflets.

Methods: To test this repair, a previously validated ex vivo model in an explanted porcine heart was used, wherein annular and leaflet geometry were evaluated using a 3-dimensional structured light scanner at 4 time points: (1) baseline, (2) induction of FTR, (3) annuloplasty repair, and (4) patch repair.

Results: Compared with the regurgitant tricuspid valve, annuloplasty reduced annular circumference (13.7 to 9.5 cm) and area (13.7 vs 6.1 cm²), whereas TRAPP repair did not alter annular dimensions (circumference: 13.7 vs 13.5 cm; area: 13.7 vs 13.6 cm²). Annuloplasty increased leaflet tenting angles (anterior: 53.5° vs 41.0°; posterior: 59.7° vs 48.2°; septal: 38.9° vs 31.4°) whereas TRAPP repair relieved anterior and posterior leaflet tenting (anterior: 28.9° vs 41.0°; posterior: 34.9° vs 48.2°; septal: 33.2° vs 31.4°) and restored geometry comparable to the native tricuspid valve. Central coaptation lengths were greater with TRAPP repair than with annuloplasty for all 3 leaflets (anterior: 12.7 vs 9.5 mm; posterior: 12.2 vs 8.2 mm; septal: 7.4 vs 4.6 mm).

Conclusions: Compared with annuloplasty, TRAPP repair yielded greater coaptation length, resolved leaflet tethering, and resulted in a larger annular area that may facilitate durable repair of advanced FTR, which previously would have required replacement.

Keywords: TRAPP repair; annuloplasty; functional tricuspid regurgitation; pericardial repair; tricuspid repair.