Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2025 Feb;35(2):125-139.
doi: 10.1111/pan.15034. Epub 2024 Nov 9.

Protocol development and feasibility of the PEACH in Asia study: A pilot study on PEri-anesthetic morbidity in CHildren in Asia

Soichiro Obara  1   2 , Choon Looi Bong  3 , Zehra Serpil Ustalar Ozgen  4 , Shemila Abbasi  5 , Ekta Rai  6 , Evangeline K Villa  7 , Andi Ade W Ramlan  8 , Raihanita Zahra  8 , Christopher Kapuangan  8 , Komang Ayu Ferdiana  8 , Ina Ismiarti Shariffuddin  9 , Vivian Yuen  10 , Elsa Varghese  11 , Josephine S K Tan  3 , Norifumi Kuratani  12 ; Asian Society of Pediatric Anesthesiologists (ASPA) research special interest group
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Protocol development and feasibility of the PEACH in Asia study: A pilot study on PEri-anesthetic morbidity in CHildren in Asia

Soichiro Obara et al. Paediatr Anaesth. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Comprehensive data on pediatric anesthesia outcomes, particularly severe critical events (SCEs), are scarce in Asia. This highlights the need for standardized research to assess anesthesia safety and quality in the diverse settings.

Aims: The PEACH in Asia pilot study aimed to test the feasibility of a standardized protocol for investigating SCEs in anesthesia practices across Asia, evaluate the data acquisition processes, and determine the sample size for a main study.

Methods: This multicenter pilot study involved ten institutions across nine Asian countries, including children from birth to 15 years undergoing diagnostic or surgical procedures. Data on SCEs were collected using standardized definitions. The study assessed the feasibility and estimated the sample size needed for the main study.

Results: The pilot study enrolled 330 patients, with a SCE incidence of 12.4% (95% CI: 9.2-16.4%). Respiratory events were observed in 7.0% of cases, cardiovascular instability in 4.9%, and drug errors in 0.6%. Based on the SCE incidence observed in the pilot study, the estimated sample size required for the main study is at least 10 958 patients. The pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of the study protocol but identified several challenges, particularly in resource-limited settings. These challenges included a significant burden associated with data collection, technical issues with electronic case report forms (e-CRFs), variability in patient enrollment across institutions (ranging from 4 to 86 patients per site), and incomplete data acquisition (24.8% of height data and 9.7% of disposition data were missing).

Conclusions: The PEACH in Asia pilot study successfully validated a protocol for investigating SCEs in pediatric anesthesia across Asia. Addressing the challenges identified in the pilot study will be crucial for generating robust data to improve pediatric anesthesia safety in the region. Key issues to address include improving data collection methods, resolving e-CRF technical difficulties, and ensuring consistent institutional support.

Keywords: Asia; child; multicenter study; pediatric anesthesia; quality improvement; sample size.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All the authors are members of the Asian Society of Pediatric Anaesthesiologists (ASPA) research special interest group. SZU Ozgen is the current president of the ASPA and the current chair of pediatric anesthesia committee for the World Federations of Societies of Anaesthesiologists WFSA. Otherwise, the authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Cronje L. A review of paediatric anaesthetic‐related mortality, serious adverse events and critical incidents. South Afr J Anaesth Analg. 2015;21:147‐153.
    1. Gonzalez LP, Pignaton W, Kusano PS, Módolo NSP, Braz JRC, Braz LG. Anesthesia‐related mortality in pediatric patients: a systematic review. Clinics. 2012;67:381‐387. - PMC - PubMed
    1. MacLennan AI, Smith AF. An analysis of critical incidents relevant to pediatric anesthesia reported to the UK national reporting and learning system, 2006‐2008. Pediatr Anesth. 2011;21:841‐847. - PubMed
    1. de Graaff JC, Sarfo MC, van Wolfswinkel L, van der Werff DBM, Schouten ANJ. Anesthesia‐related critical incidents in the perioperative period in children; a proposal for an anesthesia‐related reporting system for critical incidents in children. Pediatr Anesth. 2015;25:621‐629. - PubMed
    1. Williams GD, Muffly MK, Mendoza JM, Wixson N, Leong K, Claure RE. Reporting of perioperative adverse events by pediatric anesthesiologists at a tertiary children's hospital: targeted interventions to increase the rate of reporting. Anesth Analg. 2017;125:1515‐1523. - PubMed

Publication types