Efficacy and safety of estetrol (15 mg)/drospirenone (3 mg) combination in a cyclic regimen for the treatment of primary and secondary dysmenorrhea: a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study
- PMID: 39521109
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.11.003
Efficacy and safety of estetrol (15 mg)/drospirenone (3 mg) combination in a cyclic regimen for the treatment of primary and secondary dysmenorrhea: a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the estetrol (E4) (15 mg)/drospirenone (DRSP) (3 mg) combination in a cyclic regimen in Japanese women with primary and secondary dysmenorrhea.
Design: A 16-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, followed by a 36-week, open-label, extension study.
Subjects: A total of 162 Japanese women with primary and secondary dysmenorrhea.
Intervention: Participants were randomly allocated to either the E4/DRSP group or the placebo group. In the E4/DRSP group, participants orally received one tablet containing E4 (15 mg) and DRSP (3 mg daily) for 24 days, followed by a placebo tablet for 4 days, constituting one cycle. The placebo group was given one placebo tablet daily for 28 days. After 16 weeks, participants in the placebo group were switched to receive E4/DRSP for 36 weeks.
Main outcome measures: Absolute change in the most severe total dysmenorrhea score from baseline to the end of the 16-week double-blinded period.
Results: Estetrol/drospirenone reduced the most severe total dysmenorrhea score by 2.3 points from baseline at week 16. The between-group difference was significant (-1.4, two-sided 95% confidence interval, -1.8 to -1.0), showing superiority to placebo. The responder rate, the proportion of participants who achieved a ≥2.0-point reduction in the most severe total dysmenorrhea score from baseline, was 64.3% in the E4/DRSP group, significantly higher than in the placebo group, 28.4%. In the E4/DRSP group, visual analogue scale scores for pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea symptoms during the menstrual bleeding periods were decreased by 44.2 and 42.3 mm, respectively, from baseline at week 16, significantly more than in the placebo group. Objective gynecological examinations suggested amelioration of pelvic tenderness, uterine mobility, and cul-de sac induration in the E4/DRSP group. Estetrol/drospirenone improved the quality of life-related questionnaires (interference with daily activities and sleeping) and global impression scores. Intermenstrual bleeding was the primary treatment-emergent adverse event in the E4/DRSP group, similar to combined oral contraceptives. There were no cases of venous thromboembolism and less impact on hemostasis parameters in the E4/DRSP group.
Conclusion: Estetrol/drospirenone is an effective treatment for dysmenorrhea, offering a safe, new treatment option with potentially reduced thromboembolic risk.
Clinical trial registration number: jRCT2011210023.
Keywords: Estetrol; drospirenone; dysmenorrhea; estrogen-progestin combination; symptom alleviation.
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Interests Y.O. reports that medical writing and clinical trial advisory fee payment was made by Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd. based on medical expert contract for the submitted work; clinical trial advisory fee payment from Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd. was made based on medical expert contract; and case study meeting fee payment was made by Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd. based on medical expert contracts, outside the submitted work. T.K. reports that medical writing and clinical trial advisory fee payment was made by Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd. based on medical expert contract for the submitted work. A.H. reports that medical writing and clinical trial advisory fee payment was made by Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd. based on clinical biostatistics expert contract for the submitted work; clinical trial advisory fee payment was made based on clinical biostatistics expert contract; and clinical biostatistics educational seminar fee payment was made based on clinical biostatistics expert contract form Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd., outside the submitted work. T.T. reports that this study was sponsored by Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd.; and all funds for study, salary, and article processing charges are paid by Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd. and Mithra Pharmaceuticals. M.N. reports that this study was sponsored by Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd.; all funds for study, salary, and article processing charges are paid by Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd. and Mithra Pharmaceuticals; and also a patent has been filed with regard to the improvement of cul-de sac induration, pelvic tenderness, and uterine mobility in subjects with endometriosis complicated by adenomyosis. K.T. reports that this study was sponsored by Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd.; all funds for study, salary, and article processing charges are paid by Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd. and Mithra Pharmaceuticals; and also a patent has been filed with regard to the improvement of cul-de sac induration, pelvic tenderness, and uterine mobility in subjects with endometriosis complicated by adenomyosis. T.M. reports that this study was sponsored by Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd.; and all funds for study, salary, and article processing charges are paid by Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd. and Mithra Pharmaceuticals. M.H. reports that this study was sponsored by Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd.; all funds for study, salary, and article processing charges are paid by Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd. and Mithra Pharmaceuticals; and also a patent has been filed with regard to the improvement of cul-de sac induration, pelvic tenderness, and uterine mobility in subjects with endometriosis complicated by adenomyosis. J.-M.F. is a member of the board at Mithra Pharmaceuticals and received financial support for the supervision of this study; and consulting fees from Mithra Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. T.H. reports that medical writing and clinical trial advisory fee payment was made by Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd. based on medical expert contract for the submitted work; clinical trial advisory fee payment from Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd. was made based on medical expert contract; and case study meeting fee payment was made by Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd. based on medical expert contracts, outside the submitted work.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
