Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar;42(3):e15470.
doi: 10.1111/dme.15470. Epub 2024 Nov 9.

Investigating health professionals' perspectives and experiences of food security-related conversations in diabetes care

Affiliations

Investigating health professionals' perspectives and experiences of food security-related conversations in diabetes care

Sophie Mohamed et al. Diabet Med. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

Aims: Household food insecurity (FI) is a serious public health concern and disproportionately affects people living with chronic health conditions, undermining diabetes self-management. Little is known about healthcare professionals' (HCPs) experiences of supporting people affected by diabetes and FI, and no national guidelines incorporate consideration of FI within UK diabetes care. A qualitative study of NHS HCPs' consideration of FI within diabetes care, and the extent to which it informs their clinical practice, was undertaken.

Methods: Fifteen HCPs providing self-management support to people with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes in a Scottish Health Board took part in semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using a thematic framework approach informed by the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour (COM-B) model of behaviour change.

Results: Although the potential impact of FI on diabetes self-management was recognised, this important consideration was not currently core to their clinical practice. Enablers and barriers identified included: personal feelings about raising the issue, lack of knowledge of available resources, the patient-practitioner relationship, and the wider socioeconomic environment. Practical suggestions to support HCPs included: specific training on communication, access to patient support information, use of a screening tool to assess FI, and building NHS-third sector links.

Conclusions: Our findings provide insight into cognitive factors, emotional processes and environmental systems impacting on HCPs' practice supporting individuals with diabetes and FI. Research with affected patients is needed to gain a better understanding of how to provide support within NHS settings.

Keywords: diabetes care; diabetes self‐management; eating behaviours; food insecurity; poverty; social determinants of health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests to report.

Similar articles

References

    1. Dowler EA, O'Connor D. Rights‐based approaches to addressing food poverty and food insecurity in Ireland and UK. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(1):44‐51. - PubMed
    1. Knight JK, Fritz Z. Doctors have an ethical obligation to ask patients about food insecurity: what is stopping us? J Med Ethics. 2002;48(10):707‐711. - PMC - PubMed
    1. MacLeod MA, Curl A, Kearns A. Understanding the prevalence and drivers of food bank use: evidence from deprived communities in Glasgow. Soc Policy Soc. 2019;18(1):67‐86.
    1. Sosenko F, Livingstone N, Fitzpatrick S. Overview of Food Aid Provision in Scotland. Edinburgh; 2013.
    1. Vozoris NT, Tarasuk VS. Household food insufficiency is associated with poorer health. J Nutr. 2003;133(1):120‐126. - PubMed

Grants and funding