Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Nov 9;24(1):1286.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06303-3.

Prevalence of neurophobia among medical students and young doctors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Fei Han #  1 , Ding-Ding Zhang #  2 , Yao Zhang  1 , Li-Xin Zhou  1 , Yi-Cheng Zhu  1 , Jun Ni  3
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Prevalence of neurophobia among medical students and young doctors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Fei Han et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Neurophobia is a global phenomenon, that influences both medical students and postgraduate trainees. We aimed to analyze the prevalence of neurophobia by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on neurophobia, and potential associated risk factors.

Methods: The search was done in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases for studies reporting neurophobia among medical students and young doctors for the period up to March 18, 2024. The overall prevalence and scores of four subcomponents of neurophobia were pooled. The potential heterogeneity was tested through meta-regression/subgroup analyses/influence analysis.

Results: Twenty-four studies from 30 countries met the inclusion criteria and involved 10,395 responding individuals. The estimated overall pooled prevalence of neurophobia was 46% (95%CI, 35-57%; I2 = 98%). The result of the meta-regression revealed that geographic region was significantly associated with the prevalence (p = 0.006). The pooled scores of the four subcomponents of neurophobia were: difficulty 3.79 (95%CI, 3.47-4.12, I2 = 99%), confidence 2.81 (95%CI, 2.39-3.24, I2 = 99.5%), interest 3.22 (95%CI, 2.84-3.61, I2 = 99.6%), and knowledge 2.73 (95%CI, 2.39-3.06, I2 = 98.1%).

Conclusions: Neurophobia was widely prevalent among medical students and young doctors. The high prevalence and severity highlight the need for targeted interventions to reduce neurophobia.

Keywords: Meta-analysis; Neurology education; Neurophobia; Prevalence; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow chart of study screening
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(A) Forest plot of the overall prevalence of neurophobia. (B) Pooled prevalence of neurophobia related to type of participants. (C) Pooled prevalence of neurophobia related to geographic regions. UG, undergraduate; PG, postgraduate
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The forest plots of scores for each subcomponent of neurophobia (A) Difficulty; (B) Confidence; (C) Interest; (D) Knowledge. UG, undergraduate; PG, postgraduate
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jozefowicz RF. Neurophobia: the fear of neurology among medical students. Arch Neurol. 1994;51:328–9. - PubMed
    1. Dall TM, Storm MV, Chakrabarti R, Drogan O, Keran CM, Donofrio PD, et al. Supply and demand analysis of the current and future US neurology workforce. Neurology. 2013;81:470–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Freeman WD, Vatz KA, Griggs RC, Pedley T. The Workforce Task Force report: clinical implications for neurology. Neurology. 2013;81:479–86. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lukas RV, Dong H, Li J, Wang Z, Jiang I, Sherer R. Perceptions of clinical neurosciences among trainees in Wuhan, China. Future Neurol. 2017;12:65–70.
    1. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources