Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 9;25(1):128.
doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01128-7.

Ethics in the operating room: a systematic review

Kari Milch Agledahl  1   2 , Reidar Pedersen  3
Affiliations

Ethics in the operating room: a systematic review

Kari Milch Agledahl et al. BMC Med Ethics. .

Abstract

Background/objective: The act of surgery involves harming vulnerable patients with the intent that the results will improve their health and, ultimately, help the patients. Such activities will inevitably entail moral decisions, yet the ethics of surgery has only recently developed as a field of medical ethics. Within this field, it is striking how few accounts there are of actions within the operating room. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate how much of the scientific publications on surgical ethics focus on what take place inside the operating room and to explore the ethical issues included in the publications that focus on medical ethics in the operating room.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of the Medline and Embase databases using a PICO model and the search terms "surgery", "ethics" and "operating room". Papers were included if they focused on doctors, entailed activities inside the operating room and contained some ethical analysis. Thematic synthesis was used for data extraction and analysis.

Findings: Fewer than 2% of the scientific publications on surgical ethics included activities inside the operating room. A total of 108 studies were included in the full-text analysis and reported according to the RESERVE guidelines. Eight content areas covered 2/3 of the included papers: DNR orders in the OR, overlapping surgery, donation of organs, broadcasting live surgery, video recordings in the OR, communication/teamwork, implementing new surgical technology, and denying blood to Jehovah's Witness.

Discussion/conclusions: This systematic review indicates that only a small fraction of scientific publications on the ethics of surgery focus on issues inside the operating room, accentuating the need for further research to close this gap. The ethical issues that repeatedly arose in the included papers included the meaning of patient autonomy inside the operating room, the consequences of technological advances in surgery, the balancing of legitimate interests, the dehumanising potential of the OR, and the strong notion of surgeon responsibility.

Keywords: Clinical ethics; Medical ethics; Operating room; Surgery; Surgical ethics; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gawande A. Complications: A surgeon’s notes on an Imperfect Science. New York: Metropolitan Books; 2002.
    1. Sade RM, editor. The ethics of surgery. Conflicts and controversies. New York: Oxford University Press; 2015.
    1. Coldicott Y, Pope C, Roberts C. The ethics of intimate examinations-teaching tomorrow’s doctors. BMJ. 2003;326(7380):97–101. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.
    1. Tung T, Organ CH Jr. Ethics in surgery: historical perspective. Arch Surg. 2000;135:10–3. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources