Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 10;28(1):152.
doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-03002-5.

Safety and feasibility of robotic surgery in geriatric patients with rectal cancer

Affiliations

Safety and feasibility of robotic surgery in geriatric patients with rectal cancer

U Topal et al. Tech Coloproctol. .

Abstract

Background: The incidence of rectal cancer is increasing in the elderly population, yet the safety of surgical interventions in this group, particularly robotic surgery, is still debated. This study aims to investigate the safety and short-term postoperative outcomes of robotic surgery in geriatric patients (aged ≥ 70 years) with rectal cancer.

Patients: Patients diagnosed with rectal cancer and undergoing robotic surgery between March 2021 and September 2023 were divided into two groups based on age: the elderly group (aged ≥ 70 years) and the younger group (aged < 70 years), totaling 108 patients.

Results: The study included 80 younger patients in group 1 and 28 elderly patients in group 2. The groups had similar gender distribution and tumor characteristics. The elderly group had higher ASA scores and lower albumin levels and underwent the Miles procedure more frequently. The stoma rate was higher in the elderly group. Operation duration, tumor diameter, lymph node dissection numbers, pathological stage, and other histopathological features were similar in the two groups. Postoperative outcomes like hospital stay, complication rates, anastomotic leakage, reoperation rates, unplanned readmissions, and mortality were comparable between the groups.

Conclusions: Robotic surgery for rectal cancer in elderly patients is technically feasible and safe. Age should not be a determining factor in patient selection for robotic surgery or be considered a risk factor for postoperative complications.

Keywords: Age; Complication; Mortality; Rectal cancer; Robotic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Eurostat Eurostat database. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/main/data/database . Accessed on 10 Nov 2023
    1. World Health Organization (2021) Ageing and health. https://www.who.int/news-room/factsheets/detail/ageing-and-health . Accessed on 10 Nov 2023
    1. Smith BD, Smith GL, Hurria A, Hortobagyi GN, Buchholz TA (2009) Future of cancer incidence in the United States: burdens upon an aging, changing nation. J Clin Oncol 27(17):2758–2765 - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization (2018) World health organization cancer–key facts. [ http://www.who.int/newsroom/fact sheets/detail/cancer]( http://www.who.int/newsroom/fact sheets/detail/cancer). Accessed on 11 Nov 2023
    1. Glynne-Jones R, Wyrwicz L, Tiret E et al (2017) Rectal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 28(suppl_4):iv22-iv40 - DOI

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources