Safety and feasibility of robotic surgery in geriatric patients with rectal cancer
- PMID: 39522086
- DOI: 10.1007/s10151-024-03002-5
Safety and feasibility of robotic surgery in geriatric patients with rectal cancer
Abstract
Background: The incidence of rectal cancer is increasing in the elderly population, yet the safety of surgical interventions in this group, particularly robotic surgery, is still debated. This study aims to investigate the safety and short-term postoperative outcomes of robotic surgery in geriatric patients (aged ≥ 70 years) with rectal cancer.
Patients: Patients diagnosed with rectal cancer and undergoing robotic surgery between March 2021 and September 2023 were divided into two groups based on age: the elderly group (aged ≥ 70 years) and the younger group (aged < 70 years), totaling 108 patients.
Results: The study included 80 younger patients in group 1 and 28 elderly patients in group 2. The groups had similar gender distribution and tumor characteristics. The elderly group had higher ASA scores and lower albumin levels and underwent the Miles procedure more frequently. The stoma rate was higher in the elderly group. Operation duration, tumor diameter, lymph node dissection numbers, pathological stage, and other histopathological features were similar in the two groups. Postoperative outcomes like hospital stay, complication rates, anastomotic leakage, reoperation rates, unplanned readmissions, and mortality were comparable between the groups.
Conclusions: Robotic surgery for rectal cancer in elderly patients is technically feasible and safe. Age should not be a determining factor in patient selection for robotic surgery or be considered a risk factor for postoperative complications.
Keywords: Age; Complication; Mortality; Rectal cancer; Robotic surgery.
© 2024. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Similar articles
-
[Short-term efficacy of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for mid-low advanced rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):370-376. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20190725-00289. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020. PMID: 32306605 Chinese.
-
Robotic-assisted surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes: the Mayo Clinic experience.Surg Endosc. 2025 Apr;39(4):2498-2505. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11634-3. Epub 2025 Feb 25. Surg Endosc. 2025. PMID: 40000455
-
[Analysis of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery on 162 cases with rectal neoplasms].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):384-389. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20191017-00453. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020. PMID: 32306607 Chinese.
-
Feasibility of robotic surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.J Robot Surg. 2025 Jan 17;19(1):50. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02210-3. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 39821468 Review.
-
Comparison of surgical outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 27;19(1):177. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02358-6. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40287880 Review.
References
-
- Eurostat Eurostat database. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/main/data/database . Accessed on 10 Nov 2023
-
- World Health Organization (2021) Ageing and health. https://www.who.int/news-room/factsheets/detail/ageing-and-health . Accessed on 10 Nov 2023
-
- World Health Organization (2018) World health organization cancer–key facts. [ http://www.who.int/newsroom/fact sheets/detail/cancer]( http://www.who.int/newsroom/fact sheets/detail/cancer). Accessed on 11 Nov 2023
-
- Glynne-Jones R, Wyrwicz L, Tiret E et al (2017) Rectal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 28(suppl_4):iv22-iv40 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical