Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 1:191:260-275.
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.11.009. Epub 2024 Nov 8.

Decellularized porcine dermal hydrogel enhances implant-based wound healing in the setting of irradiation

Affiliations

Decellularized porcine dermal hydrogel enhances implant-based wound healing in the setting of irradiation

Lillian DeCostanza et al. Acta Biomater. .

Abstract

Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) provides mechanical and soft tissue support in implant-based breast reconstruction, and has shown to modulate the healing response. However, skin flap necrosis, edema, and previous radiation therapy can hinder ADM integration. Effective biomaterial integration requires regulating the immune response, fibrosis, and adipocyte-driven functionalization. Extracellular matrix (ECM) hydrogels have demonstrated utility in tissue regeneration, and decreasing inflammation and fibrosis in various tissues. Therefore, we hypothesized that a Decellularized Porcine Dermal (DPD) hydrogel to support ADM integration would prevent excessive fibrosis, regulate the macrophage response, and promote adipogenesis. Exploration of DPD hydrogel during ADM implantation in mice (healthy and radiated) revealed long-term effects of irradiation on implant wound healing. DPD hydrogel rescued radiation-induced fibrosis, restoring capsule thickness of healthy mice, and did not increase the fibroblast migration into the ADM. As a modulating soft tissue filler, DPD hydrogel also promoted adipocyte infiltration in healthy and irradiated mice. Detailed macrophage analysis showed that radiation led to the increase in pro-inflammatory, transition, and reparative markers. Despite relatively subtle effects on individual macrophage phenotype markers, multidimensional flow cytometry analysis revealed that DPD hydrogel temporally regulated two subpopulations. he presence of DPD resulted in significantly reduced CD9HiArg1HiCD301bLo and CD163HiCD38HiCD301bHi macrophages in healthy mice at one week, and a significant increase in CD9High macrophages with low expression of other markers at 6 weeks in irradiated mice. DPD hydrogel promotes a decreased fibrotic, and adipocyte-promoting coordination of wound healing in healthy and irradiated wound beds while not disrupting the immunomodulatory effects of ADM. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) provides mechanical and soft tissue support in post-mastectomy implant-based breast reconstruction, and positively affects wound healing. Following breast reconstruction, skin flap necrosis, edema, and previous radiation therapy can hinder ADM integration. Effective wound healing and biomaterial integration requires regulating the cellular immune response. Extracellular matrix hydrogels have demonstrated utility in tissue regeneration and decreasing inflammation and fibrosis in various tissues, but has yet to be utilized in the setting of breast reconstruction. Here, we demonstrated that a decellularized dermal hydrogel as an adjunct to ADM, decreases fibrosis and promotes adipogenesis during the coordination of wound healing in healthy and clinically relevant microenvironments that have received radiation therapy while not disrupting the immunomodulatory effects of implanted ADM.

Keywords: Decellularized dermis; Extracellular matrix hydrogel; Fibrosis; Implant- based breast reconstruction; Radiation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

    1. Margulies IG, Salzberg CA, The use of acellular dermal matrix in breast reconstruction: evolution of techniques over 2 decades, Gland Surg 8 (2019) 3. 10.21037/GS.2018.10.05. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Du Plessis MI, Cottler PS, Campbell CA, Acellular Dermal Matrix Favorably Modulates the Healing Response after Surgery, Plast Reconstr Surg 150 (2022) 290E–299E. 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009338. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee KT, Mun GH, Updated Evidence of Acellular Dermal Matrix Use for Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis, Ann Surg Oncol 23 (2016) 600–610. 10.1245/s10434-015-4873-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marquez JL, French M, Ormiston L, Pires G, Martheswaran T, Eddington D, Tuncer F, Agarwal JP, Kwok AC, Outcomes after tissue expander exchange to implant in two-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix: A retrospective cohort study, J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 89 (2024) 97–104. 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.12.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Falk MW, Kullab RB, Lau A, Weltz TK, Hemmingsen MN, Larsen A, Orholt M, V Vester-Glowinski P, Herly M, The association between rare complications and the use of acellular dermal matrix in patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction, J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 90 (2024) 101–102. 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.02.014. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources